User talk:01lt

01lt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 01lt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Archiedesai per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Archiedesai. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

01lt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting an unblock for my account. I was blocked as a sockpuppet, but this was a mistake. I do not have any other accounts and have never engaged in sockpuppetry. I believe the block may have been triggered by sharing a public IP address with a family member who also edits, or by editing from multiple locations (home, university, cafe). I have reviewed the sockpuppetry policy and will ensure my future editing aligns with all rules. I'm a good-faith editor who wants to continue contributing to Wikipedia. I apologize for any disruption and thank you for your consideration. 01lt (talk) 11:54, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I might buy that if you were blocked yesterday and not over 4 years ago. Where have you been? I can believe that this might be your only account, but that would only make this meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for your guidance. I am new to this and am eager to learn from all the contributors

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

01lt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for the question. You asked about my 4-year absence from editing. I understand why that would be a point of concern. For the past four years, I was on an extended work assignment for my company, which required me to be in a location with limited and controlled internet access. This assignment consumed all of my professional time and also restricted my ability to access external websites for personal use.

I was not in a position to edit Wikipedia or engage in any other online activities. The assignment has now ended, and I am back and eager to resume my contributions to the encyclopedia.

I can confirm that I have only ever used this one account. I have never used or operated any other accounts, and I am not a sockpuppet. I have reviewed the sockpuppetry policy and am fully committed to following all of Wikipedia's guidelines.

I apologize for the long period of inactivity, but it was beyond my control. I hope this explanation clarifies the situation and that you will reconsider unblocking my account. I look forward to contributing positively again. 01lt (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place posts at the bottom so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply" to edit this page, the reply function is imperfect and doesn't work well in every situation. 331dot (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

01lt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to thank you for your cooperation and for taking the time to review my case. I understand the importance of maintaining a trusted editing environment on Wikipedia, and I appreciate your dedication to this. I've read through the policies again and am committed to being a constructive member of the community. I genuinely want to contribute my time and knowledge to improve the encyclopedia, and I would be grateful for the chance to do so. Please help me become a positive contributor again. Thank you for your consideration. 01lt (talk) 20:23, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. Also, please follow the instructions that are given to you on this page. If English is not your native language, please consider editing the version of Wikipedia in your native language. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.