Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cactusisme was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Video Game Museum of CADPA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I recently received feedback indicating that some of the sources cited in my draft may not be considered reliable. I truly want to improve the draft in accordance with Wikipedia's standards, but I am unsure which specific sources are in question.
Several of the references I included are from well-established Chinese media outlets and official websites, as well as one from a reputable Korean news organization. These are considered credible and authentic within our local context.
I would be very grateful if you could kindly clarify which specific sources are deemed unreliable, and provide guidance on how I might revise or replace them to meet Wikipedia's requirements. Your support would mean a lot to me. 周也 (talk) 10:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 周也!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cactus🌵spikyouch10:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
It doesn't appear this subject is notable enough, please add more substantial, independent and reliable sources in order to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Video Game Museum of CADPA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
