User talk:伊丽莎白大声

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]
Hello, 伊丽莎白大声, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

伊丽莎白大声, good luck, and have fun. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 01:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good Evening @Izno, I just received a block notification I don’t understand why or what I’m involved in. I haven’t violated any issues on Wikipedia or done any vandal edits. I believe this could be a mistake or you’d please try explaining to me what is happening. Thanks 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 02:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

伊丽莎白大声 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello User:Izno, I'm reaching out regarding the block on my account. After reviewing my recent activity, I believe this might be an error. I haven't made any edits recently due to my academic commitments, and I'm not aware of any policy violations. Could you please review my account and consider lifting the block if it was indeed a mistake? I'd appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Best regards,

Decline reason:

Admitted sockpuppetry (Wakabenga) below. Yamla (talk) 09:54, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are confirmed to the editor Idrisskunle (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) which is an account locked for spam. Additionally, you are confirmed to Wakabenga (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) which I will go block now. Izno (talk) 04:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the accounthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wakabenga is my other account But I don’t understand how I am connected to the account Idris kunle or how I have violated Wikipedia editor guidelines. I was not aware having multiple accounts is a problem but I created a difference to be able to contribute on topics in different locations. Kindly review my contributions I have not in any way violated editor guidelines since creation This could be a mistake 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 04:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Besides the technical evidence that says you are in control of the locked editor's account, there is also the behavioral overlap between someone who argues for the keeping of an article named Kefas Brand and under a second account creates Rodney Kefas Namisi.
You are the locked editor and this is not a mistake. Izno (talk) 05:01, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I created an article for Rodney Kefas Namisi earlier this year and after the deletion discussion I came to realize there was previous deletion discussions. I contributed to him because I had drafted articles about actors in the tv show I woke up a vampire but after the deletion. 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 05:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And given that overlap, that probably makes you Ruth Nandera (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), which the technical data also supports. Izno (talk) 05:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would to clarify I’m not any of these people. This could be a mistake 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 05:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Could you kindly atleast review my edits. I have not violated Wikipedia guidelines since I joined. My contributions have been good and positive to Wikipedia. Kindly review 伊丽莎白大声 (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]