i think i need a break like. i really have not acknowledged the sheer amount/absurdity of what i have accomplished work that i have written on wikipedia this year like holy fuck. i feel really tired and stuck and there are other things i gotta deal with. this won't be forever but i do plan to kinda try not get distracted and finish off my backlog if possible idk. // Chchcheckit (talk) 23:25, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Adeline, born September 18, 2003, known by their dumbass Beastie Boys reference Wikipedia handle Chchcheckit or their aliases Citizen Insane™ and Self Proclaimed Editorial Anarchist (SPEA), is both a wikipedia editor and fucking idiot from le isles of britan. She/They mainly writes about rock, pop, metal, rap music and whatnot, when they feel like it. They have ADHD/Autism (anyone who uses "aspergers" against you is trying to control you + diminish how you feel about living with autism. ok thats me-specific but) and find editing/writing to be a chaotic/neurotic process, but usually gets there. (people tell me i am too critical; i internalized my external oppression systems). I try to self-evaluate how I write, and am often terrified of misrepresenting or getting things wrong. that doesn't mean i'm not able to, however; ultimately i want to improve and understand myself i guess.
[six] things they never seen believe: 1. "what we do is not secret, it is in fact visible and stupid" 2. "i am not an expert, i am merely someone who gives a fuck, and that is what counts" 3. "i am not good." 4. what you do not question about yourself, you will never challenge. 5. through writing about a subject/something, you are insisting on its historicity or importance to the historical record i.e. just because you have 5 reviews doesnt mean you cant write 2500 word article using a load of interviews you cant use for the reception basically. idk what im saying the logic is probably flawed. also sense of time/place is fcked. 6. you should be writing on wikipedia because you have a strong interest/devotion to letting ppl know about whatever. if your in it to look cool/use LLMs for those sweet GAs, your in it for the wrong reasons. like im not one to chastise or condemn ppl using them, but like writing is supposed to be FUN, difficult at times but ultimately you get a sense of satisfaction from it all. don't cheat yourself out of a hard-won victory, because you'll learn nothing and never improve. i can't stop you, but i'll sigh.
WORKINONIT, or: current projects
[edit]| THE STATE OF THE... THINGS a.k.a. PROJECTS | |
|---|---|
| Kittie studio albums (8/8) +1 |
|
| Ken Carson studio albums (4/5) | |
| Good Article nominees | In Progress:
Awaiting review: |
| Good Article Reviews | |
| Workem Progresso | ACTIVELY WORKING
BACKBURNER-ish BACKBACKBURNER (i.e. you should finish what you started)
|
| Et cetera |
|
| This user helped promote the topic Ithaca studio albums to good topic status. |
| This user helped promote the topic Kittie studio albums to good topic status. |
| This user helped promote the topic Svalbard studio albums to good topic status. |
| This user has written 40 good articles on Wikipedia. |
| This user has reviewed 31 (+3) Good Article nominations on Wikipedia. |
| This user is a participant in WikiProject Women in music. |
| As a Wikipedia editor, I understand that my goal is the destruction of my purpose. |
In erecting a press exclusion zone around themselves, Huggy Bear have split their personality. To decipher their ideas now involves wrestling with a tangle of comment, a media Frankenstein of opinion, hearsay and rumour, where the often misguided idealism of journalistic supporters meets the disinformation of their opponents. [...] Huggy Bear are important, but it's not their form and not their content that makes them so. Continually shuffling instruments and roles, the fluidity of their structure contrasts heavily with the coherence of the personal experiences voiced in their music. It's this free trade in band dynamics that's ultimately more radical than any sabre wielding song.
References
[edit]Notes
Citations
- ^ Masters, Susan (November 1994). "Soundcheck". The Wire. No. 129. p. 55 – via Internet Archive.