User:Chchcheckit
WIKIPEDIA: documenting the Attention Defecit Correction Disorder™[nb 1] of Chchcheckit since July 13, 2021
[edit]Adeline, born September 18, 2003, known by their dumbass Beastie Boys reference Wikipedia handle Chchcheckit or their aliases Citizen Insane™ and Self Proclaimed Editorial Anarchist (SPEA), is both a dumbass and wikipedia editor from le isles of britan. She/They joined Wikipedia to add sales statistics to discography pages before attempting to write articles starting in early-ish 2022. They were in particular inspired to edit because of their frustration with a YouTube video that glossed over a Toadies album that took seven years to come out. From that point until mid-2023, a lot of their edits were driven on the basis of misguided emotion, poor self-worth/concept (due to external factors now dealt with), self-arrogance and a misunderstanding of the principle Non nobis solum which led to much poor quality editing. They sincerely apologize for articles written and made during that time. This editor believes they only really started becoming competent around June/July 2023 although was not yet confident until somewhere in 2024. Currently, their drive to write is based on 1. interest, 2. wanting ppl to know about things they like that no one in their real life gives a fuck about, 3. wanting underrated subjects to be better evaluated, 4. to stop misinformation/hatred/smear campaigns, which breed in voids of knowledge affected by patriarchy/hierarchy and 5. frustration towards certain journalists
Chchcheckit mainly writes about rock, metal, rap music and whatnot, when they feel like it. They have ADHD/Autism (anyone who uses "aspergers" against you is trying to control you + diminish how you feel about living with autism. ok thats me-specific but), leading to chaotic editing, and needs to joke about things in order to laugh through the pain/hardship of life because it sucks. If it sounds edgy as fuck, it's not intended but whatever. A maxim they hold is: "what we do is not secret, it is in fact visible and stupid". (people tell me i am too critical; i internalized my external oppression systems)
|| strengths: finding (many) sources/extrapolation of information; sometimes slow but usually gets there || weaknesses: receptions/poor self confidence/cannot predict motivation cycle/i misunderstand a lot
my wikipedia page might be a form of hostile architecture against forming social bonds with others through being awkward
writing style is kinda falling into a rut lately but thats ok since i am to complete/write about the things as much and as fast as possible. and im pretty good now i think though always one open eye
(Everytime I do one of these things, one can't help but feel it's going to go horribly wrong again) (try not to think about starvation) (this is nothing new)
WORKINONIT, or: current projects
[edit]| THE STATE OF THE... THINGS a.k.a. PROJECTS
(as of September 15, 2025) | |
|---|---|
| Kittie studio albums (8/8) +1 |
|
| Ken Carson studio albums (4/5) |
|
| Good Article nominees | In Progress:
Awaiting review: |
| Good Article Reviews | |
| Workem Progresso | ACTIVELY WORKING
BACKBURNER-ish BACKBACKBURNER (i.e. you should finish what you started) |
| Et cetera |
|
btstu is a bop
BECOME AN INSTITUTION. OR DIE becoming realer by the second who beckons who beckons get matyr'd or get done
one two three four concussion knocking at my door
 | This user helped promote the topic Ithaca studio albums to good topic status. |
| This user helped promote the topic Kittie studio albums to good topic status. |
| This user helped promote the topic Svalbard studio albums to good topic status. |
 | This user has written 34 good articles on Wikipedia. |
| This user has reviewed 28 (+1) Good Article nominations on Wikipedia. |
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Women in music. |
 | As a Wikipedia editor, I understand that my goal is the destruction of my purpose. |
In erecting a press exclusion zone around themselves, Huggy Bear have split their personality. To decipher their ideas now involves wrestling with a tangle of comment, a media Frankenstein of opinion, hearsay and rumour, where the often misguided idealism of journalistic supporters meets the disinformation of their opponents. [...] Huggy Bear are important, but it's not their form and not their content that makes them so. Continually shuffling instruments and roles, the fluidity of their structure contrasts heavily with the coherence of the personal experiences voiced in their music. It's this free trade in band dynamics that's ultimately more radical than any sabre wielding song.
References
[edit]Notes
- ^ ok so apparently i score really high for depression
Citations
- ^ Masters, Susan (November 1994). "Soundcheck". The Wire. No. 129. p. 55 – via Internet Archive.