Talk:Worker Protection Standard

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Law Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Occupational Safety and Health Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Page created.Nanoatzin (talk) 04:29, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why all the DoD information?

Why is there so much DoD worker information? I thought the Worker Protection Standard was for agricultural workers dealing with pesticides. Do DoD workers ever apply pesticides on farms or work in fields with pesticides applied? I kind of doubt it. Also, the actual pesticide information is pretty disjointed, so I'll be starting to work on that. Vetus Agricola (talk) 02:16, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added the Split template for the above reason. Thoughts, anyone? Vetus Agricola (talk) 00:57, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vetus Agricola: I don't understand the DoD content well. It's about many things all at once. If all of that was split into a separate article, what would be the name of that article? —Alalch E. 01:39, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hell. Be bold. Delete ALL the DOD stuff. Useless here and of no value anywhere else. David notMD (talk) 02:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have a response for that. I'm just wanting it separated from the agricultural portion so I can work on that. I was hoping to leave the DoD portion for someone else because that's outside my field of knowledge. Vetus Agricola (talk) 02:44, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the discussed content, that can neither fit and be worked on here nor can it form a separate article. It stays in the history, but you or anyone else can copy it to a userspace page or start a draft. Cheers —Alalch E. 02:49, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also moved RUP content to Restricted use pesticides leaving a mention here, since the content was highly overlapping with that article. —Alalch E. 15:00, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]