Talk:Wolfram von Richthofen

Wolfram von Richthofen was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 25, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wolfram von Richthofen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 4 months

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Mid‑importance Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Aviation / Biography / European / German / World War I / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Military biography task force European military history task force German military history task force World War I task force World War II task force Aviation: Biography Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aerospace biography project. Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Section on Guernica

Perhaps this is just me but it seems a little...partisan, I suppose? Does it in its current state fit within Wikipedia's guidelines or is something amiss? Not accusing anyone, but it seems especially crafted to make Guernica seem like "no big deal" by only citing one, very conservative, figure of the casualties and over-all it strikes me as having a specific prerogative on the part of the author.

A date

• Appears in the Genealogisches Handbuch des Adels, Band XIX (1996), s. 230. WIth these dates. - Nunh-huh 21:10, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Changes recently

The lead does not repeat itself. The reputation part has not been completed yet. Dapi89 (talk)•