Talk:Windows 10

Good articleWindows 10 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 30, 2014Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
October 4, 2015Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 17, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Terry Myerson compared the technological differences between Windows 10 and 7 to the differences between a Tesla and a first-generation Prius?
Current status: Good article

Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024

[edit]

Add that its the last version to run on machines without SSE4.2/POPCNT since only the drop of x86-32 is mentioned for CPU requirement changes Unlikethesun (talk) 08:24, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. A reliable source like a news article would also show that the detail is relevant enough to add to the article. FifthFive (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Going by official requirements, this is redundant, as all TPM 2.0 CPUs, along with the official list of supported CPUs, support SSE4.2/POPCNT. Going by unofficial, Windows 11 23H2 is the last version to support machines without SSE4.2/POPCNT. Winderz IoT (talk) 03:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone ahead and added that Windows 10 is the last version to lack a CPU whitelist, since that was previously missing. Winderz IoT (talk) 13:48, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to go ahead and re-add this back in, while adding necessary caveats and using your updated source, just so you know. Winderz IoT (talk) 01:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2025

[edit]
89.241.188.172 (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing sentence

[edit]

I am unable to edit this article so someone else fix this. In the opening section, it says "It was succeeded by Windows 11, which was released on October 5, 2021. It is the last version of Microsoft Windows that supports 32-bit processors (IA-32 and ARMv7-based) and the last major version to support 64-bit processors that don't meet the x86-x64-v2 (i.e., having POPCNT and SSE4.2) or ARMv8.1 specifications, across all minor versions." I think the second sentence that starts with "It" should be changed to "Windows 10". I'm pretty sure I understand what the sentence is implying but I rarely have to second guess myself on Wikipedia. This sentence looks like it might be implying that Windows 11 the version being mentioned. Mopspear (talk) 13:40, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Also moved the first sentence to the first paragraph, which seemed more fitting. Winderz IoT (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"128-bit" OS

[edit]

I suggest getting rid of the sentence "They wanted it to be a 128-bit version." There were no 128-bit CPUs in 2009 (and there still aren't any in 2025). This may refer to Windows 10's (and Windows 8's) SSE2 requirement, but that's a SIMD extension, which doesn't make the CPU a 128-bit CPU. The sentence is extremely misleading at best, but at face value it's simply nonsensical. 87.152.202.196 (talk) 16:15, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. I'm going to go ahead and remove the sentence, as the misleading nature of the statement is clear and obvious to anyone with any amount of advanced knowledge in computing. Tcrow777 Talk 20:08, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Some components free and open-source"

[edit]

The "Source model" row of the infobox currently describes Windows 10 as "Some components free and open-source", with citations showing that Windows Terminal, Windows Calculator, Windows Driver Frameworks, and Windows Forms are freely licensed. When there are well over 100 Windows components listed in List of Microsoft Windows components, Template:Microsoft Windows components, and Category:Windows components, nearly all of which are closed-source, noting "Some components free and open-source" to highlight four of these components is undue weight in the infobox. I support removing this line from the infobox. — Newslinger talk 16:22, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 77 external links on Windows 10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Please refer to the FaQ for information on correcting errors with the bot.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]