Talk:Tony Leiker

Notes

[edit]

https://www.newspapers.com/image/846512745/?match=1&terms=tony%20leiker

https://www.newspapers.com/image/189531656/?match=2&terms=tony%20leiker

https://www.newspapers.com/image/846490427/?match=4&terms=tony%20leiker

BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tony Leiker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 01:02, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 18:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • In the lead, would it be worthwhile to add "as a replacement player" after one game during the 1987 NFL strike.
    • Done.
  • The discussion about scholarship offers he got, it comes right after the sentence about his grades. But the way it is written in the source, he was offered football scholarships, not academic scholarships. This is probably worth clarification in the actual text (I know the link already has it, but is piped).
    • Removed link piping.
  • References:
    • Everything appears reasonable for what is being cited
    • All sources are consistently formatted
    • Spot checks: 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 14

Nice work, very little area for improvement. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:04, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.