Talk:StubHub
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
History update
[edit]![]() | Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hi editors, I'm Stephanie and I work for Beutler Ink. I have several ideas to overhaul the article (I made a diff here if anyone is curious!) that will expand context, make sure the content reflects the sourcing, and improve citations and organization.
My first request is in two parts. First, I propose changing the subhead 2000–2007 to Founding and early years as this is more descriptive.
Second, I propose changing the first paragraph of the section to add additional context about the founding of StubHub, as supported by reliable sources. That would look like this:
Extended content
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
References
Altogether, the resulting text would look like this: Eric Baker had the idea for an online secondhand event ticket marketplace after he struggled to purchase secondhand tickets for a showing of The Lion King on Broadway.[1] He began developing the concept with Jeff Fluhr as part of a competition while both were students at Stanford Graduate School of Business.[2] In March 2000, the pair incorporated StubHub in San Francisco to act as that marketplace. The company raised US$600,000 in seed funding by August 2000. Fluhr left school to be chief executive officer of StubHub; Baker graduated in 2001 and became company president.[3] That year, StubHub signed its first deal with a professional sports team, partnering with the Seattle Mariners.[4] By its third year of operation, StubHub had 60 employees.[3] After having a falling out with Fluhr in 2005, Baker left the company, retaining 10% ownership.[5]
References
|
This does several things:
- Adds additional context and detail to the founding of StubHub, making the article more thorough
- Updates several citations to be more complete
- Clarifies details on the nature of founding, founding location
- Improves accuracy/clarity of statement on what Fluhr and Baker were doing when they founded the company (active students rather than mere alumni at the time)
- Removes extraneous details about routine business details that aren't relevant anymore because they didn't happen or are not especially significant (e.g. In 2002, eBay was in talks to acquire StubHub for US$20 million, although the agreement had later "fallen apart over price." and While StubHub initially intended to "build a ticket transaction system that [Fluhr] could sell to other online portals and providers", in 2003, the company began placing Google ads for the actual StubHub website instead, directly facilitating ticket sales from sellers to buyers.)
- I think WP:NOTEVERYTHING would apply here
Please let me know what you think! Happy to discuss further. Stephanie BINK (talk) 20:42, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Partly done: Retained one mention of eBay. Encoded Talk 💬 16:51, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Encoded: thanks for reviewing! Stephanie BINK (talk) 21:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
History update 2
[edit]| The user below has a request that an edit be made to StubHub. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 207 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hi editors, my next request is in two parts.
First, I propose changing the heading 2000–2007 to Founding and early years as this is more descriptive.
For the second, I propose changing up the remainder of the 2000–2007 subsection in the following way:
Extended content
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
References
Rendered out, it looks like this: Fluhr described a 2004 falling out between himself and Baker over the company direction. Baker wanted to develop partnerships with sports leagues while Fluhr preferred to focus on building the StubHub brand. The difference in direction led to Baker leaving the company while retaining a 10 percent ownership stake.[1][2][3][4] Baker founded competing agency Viagogo to operate in European markets in 2006.[5] StubHub had a positive cash flow in 2005 with sales of approximately US$200 million and revenues of approximately US$50 million.[6][3] The company successfully lobbied for law changes in New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania regarding ticket sales and the amount above face value for which tickets could be sold.[3] StubHub made approximately US$6,500 in campaign donations to Florida legislators while lobbying for the law change in that state.[7][8] In 2006, the value of tickets sold on the platform was approximately US$400 million and it generated approximately US$100 million in revenue. The company employed approximately 350 people at 12 locations.[2][3]
References
|
This does several things:
- Condenses content and removes potentially biased language (e.g. 2007 was a very successful year for the company)
- Removes sentences about investment from Pequot (poor sourcing) and Inc. 500 listing (comes off a bit promotional, though I understand if editors prefer to keep this because the source is solid)
- Explains the context of the falling out between Fluhr and Baker more
- Removes mention of the eBay acquisition (preserves chronology of the section, acquisition to be added back in the next edit request, my draft/diff shows where I intend to suggest it goes)
- Removes Fluhr/Tsakalakis transition to preserve chronology (will be added to the next subsection in the next edit request)
- Adds content related to lobbying efforts to fit better into chronology
- Updates sources and makes Manual of Style fixes where needed
Please let me know what you think! Stephanie BINK (talk) 21:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
