This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
@Star Mississippi, I made some improvements, and added a couple sources, and another image. I'm not a train person at all, but there are a lot of train and railroad enthusiasts on WP. I will leave it up to you whether you think it is ready for article space, or if a railroad person would like to develop it more. The NARA doc has a lot more information about the two railroad cars, but I am totally clueless as to what some of the technical terms mean or whether they are of importance for an encyclopedia article, so I don't know how to prioritize what should be in the article or not. Netherzone (talk) 00:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I accepted it. I think it's fine for mainspace and anything else can be added. Thanks for all of your work on it (and @Liz for tagging it so the notice crossed our watchlists) StarMississippi01:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm very late here, but the article looks ok for mainspace, although reference 5 isn't an acceptable reference. Stuff on the NRHP is usually presumed notable, for better or for worse. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the sentence and source; it seems to have been one of Doncram's notes to himself. In looking for a solid source to replace it, all I found were travel guides and a book published by Arcadia Publishing Inc.. There have been several discussions (with no solid outcome) on whether or not Arcadia is a RS, so I did not use it. If something more substantial is found in the future, it can be added to the article. Netherzone (talk) 15:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]