Talk:Seva Foundation

Inconsistency

[edit]

Untitled

[edit]

The article says:

seva ... founded in 1978 by public health expert Dr. Larry Brilliant.

But the Larry Brilliant page says:

Co-founder and chairman of Seva

And the Neem_Karoli_Baba page says:

After returning to the United States, Ram Dass and Larry Brilliant founded the Seva Foundation

75.93.149.42 (talk) 02:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Gifts of Service

[edit]

Doesn't merit a separate article Rathfelder (talk) 10:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --Krinkle (talk) 23:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

My team and I am doing some paid consulting work for the Seva Foundation. We noticed that the information on their Wikipedia page was woefully out of date and much of it was inaccurate. Our edits replace the incorrect text with up to date information about how the organization functions. We are not trying to advertise Seva or promote a product, and we’d be happy to remove the section that gives information about the organization’s fundraising program if that would make the rest of the edits more acceptable. We could also make the updated page shorter, with less detail, if that is needed. But I want to emphasize that all the information is accurate and is not promoting a product or a fundraising event.

We will work on finding more external sources. Bjameskimball (talk) 23:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bjameskimball, thank you for declaring your paid status. You'll need to make a complete paid-contribution disclosure – I'll leave a note on your talk-page about that. Any member of your "team" who wants to edit Wikipedia will need to create their own individual account and make a similar disclosure. Each and all of you are strongly discouraged from making any direct edit to the article. If you can identify some solid independent reliable sources that actually give some useful information about the foundation, please list them here, on this talk-page. That would be helpful, thank you. Oh, and you don't need to worry about removing stuff that you added, that's already been done. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an expert on paid contributors, but I think it would be acceptable if they did edit the article -- especially since they are being up-front about it, and are starting out by saying that they are flexible about their edits being changed or removed. That said, I guess it would be good if they posted reliable sources on the talk page, for other editors to use. Mudwater (Talk) 01:53, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I came to the article to see if anyone had noted some of the current and former Seva board members and discussed some of its lesser-known projects. I'm extremely tight for time, but I'll try to give it a shot. Given the disclosure regarding this 501(c)3, I'm okay with User Bjameskimball editing, as long as he provides sourcing. I've found similar edits by others to other high-interest articles by up-front paid, volunteer or affiliated editors, so usually try looking for sources rather than deleting content directly upon the disclosure. Activist (talk) 10:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--

Some proposed changes

[edit]
COI suggested edits, providing more accurate information concerning Seva Foundation's work

Information to be added or removed: New top-page intro:

Explanation of issue: Adding more current, up-to-date information about Seva programs. References supporting change: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.history&orgid=5295, https://www.modo.com/about/about-the-company/, http://www.seva.org/site/PageNavigator/programs/toms, https://www.toms.com/what-we-give-sight, http://first.fchampalimaud.org/en/vision-award/, https://www.impact.upenn.edu/100-and-change-bold-ideas/, https://ww1.fchampalimaud.org/premiodevisao/#blockWinnersVisao, https://www.macfound.org/programs/100change, https://www.aao.org/about/awards/humanitarian/david-heiden, http://www.seva.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Community_Health_Workers&utm_source=housefile&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=eNews&utm_content=Spring2018, http://www.seva.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Telemedicine&utm_source=housefile&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=eNews&utm_content=Spring2018, http://www.eyes.arizona.edu/Research/VisualDevelopment/TOVSP/commonvisionproblems.html Bjameskimball (talk) 01:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bjameskimball, if you want to submit this as an edit request, you'll need to add {{request edit}} at the top of it (below the words "Some proposed changes"). However, to be honest, I don't see that there's much point – I see very little likelihood of this being accepted. It's poorly written, poorly sourced and promotional in tone; even if it were none of those things, there would still be the problem of deceptive advertising. I for one would not be prepared to move pre-written advertising copy into the encyclopaedia, because it might be against the laws of the United States to do so, and those are the laws that govern this project (please note, however, that there is as yet no definitive editor consensus on this problem). If there is some significant error or omission of fact in the page, do please briefly mention it here (with properly-formatted independent reliable sources in support, of course). Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]