Talk:Science of Identity Foundation

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Potential refs

[edit]

Previously removed: Farrar, Derek (August 12, 1992). "Rick Reed's Inner Self". Honolulu Weekly. p. 1. Retrieved November 26, 2019.

There are a number of local references that have been removed over the years. --Hipal (talk) 19:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honolulu Civil Beat has published a number of relevant articles, recently https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/11/gabbards-past-could-complicate-us-senate-confirmation/ . It appears reliable per (RSN discussion). --Hipal (talk) 02:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--Hipal (talk) 00:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD lists some as well:

--Hipal (talk) 18:26, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing any further news coverage from major publishers. I've not attempted to look for local coverage. --Hipal (talk) 17:45, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant content from Tulsi Gabbard article

[edit]
  • ...two years at a girls' school in the Philippines.[1][2]

References

  1. ^ "5 things to know about Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's choice for director of national intelligence". PBS. November 14, 2024. Retrieved November 29, 2024. raised in Hawaii and spent a year of her childhood in the Philippines.
  2. ^ "How the American Sangh built up Tulsi Gabbard | The Caravan". 2024-09-19. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved 2024-11-18.
  3. ^ Bowles, Nellie (August 2, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard Thinks We're Doomed". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 2, 2019. Retrieved December 16, 2019.
  4. ^ a b Hurley, Bevan (August 4, 2019). "Meet the guitar-strumming Kiwi surfer dude who's become US presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard's secret weapon". Archived from the original on March 12, 2020. Retrieved December 9, 2019.
  5. ^ Howley, Kerry (June 11, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard Had a Very Strange Childhood". New York Magazine. Archived from the original on February 13, 2020. Retrieved January 13, 2019.
  6. ^ a b c Sanneh, Kelefa (October 30, 2017). "What Does Tulsi Gabbard Believe?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on June 7, 2020. Retrieved January 13, 2019.
  7. ^ Christensen, John (November 23, 1982). "Chris Butler: About this guru business". Honolulu Star-Bulletin. p. B-1.
  8. ^ a b Bowles, Nellie (August 2, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard Thinks We're Doomed". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 2, 2019. Retrieved December 9, 2019. She was raised in part on the teachings of the guru Mr. Butler....'he's essentially like a Vaishnava Hindu pastor'
  9. ^ McCarthy, Tom (March 19, 2019). "Who is Tulsi Gabbard? The progressive 2020 hopeful praised by Bannon and the right". The Guardian. Archived from the original on May 20, 2019. Retrieved December 16, 2019.
  10. ^ Grube, Nick (2024-12-10). "Senators Urged To Examine Gabbard's 'Deep and Intense' Ties To Hawaiʻi Sect". Honolulu Civil Beat. Retrieved 2025-01-06.
  11. ^ a b Bolante, Ronna (August 1, 2004). "Who is Mike Gabbard?". Honolulu Magazine. Archived from the original on May 6, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2019.

Simply following from what's at Tulsi Gabbard, focusing on her relationship with SIF, and drawing upon the other sources we currently use or have been reviewed above:

  • She was raised in a SIF community.
  • Her parents were long-time followers of Chris Butler and members of SIF.
  • Gabbard was mostly home schooled, but attended a SIF girls' school in the Philippines.
  • (Include Gabbard's description of her relationship with Butler, and Butler's description of his relationship with her.)
  • Gabbard continued to have strong ties to the SIF community through her life.
  • Gabbard has worked to hide her relationship with SIF.

I expect there are some main points missing, and it appears we have to qualify at least some of the information occurring after she started obscuring her relationship with SIF. --Hipal (talk) 19:23, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm uncertain what we should use to introduce the section on Gabbard. Butler's description maybe, or her family ties to SIF and how she's worked to hide them. The latter would be more consistent with the Tulsi Gabbard article, and a much more prominent topic in the references. --Hipal (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vegetarianism not notable for lead

[edit]

Vegetarianism is only one of the several aspects, mentioned in only a few sources. Many articles on SIF make no mention of Vegetarianism. The article body says: The followers should practice vegetarianism and refrain from gambling, smoking, drinking alcohol, taking drugs or having "illicit sex".

Therefore, summarization per WP:LEAD should not include Vegetarianism in the lead, unless there is a consensus on the aspect. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 03:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hipal (talk) In my view, there is no justification of singling out vegetarianism to be included in the lead per WP:RS and WP:LEAD, unless there is a consensus for it.
Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 03:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why ping me? --Hipal (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because you pinged me on my TALK page about my recent edits on this page. And, removing Vegetarianism from the lead was one of the recent edits I made.
And you seem to be involved in discussing most of the edits in the lead. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 06:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lead says: Its theology combines yoga with aspects of Gaudiya Vaishnavism, and adherents must practice vegetarianism.
While, article body says:
The followers should practice vegetarianism and refrain from gambling, smoking, drinking alcohol, taking drugs or having "illicit sex".
I think the lead should have better summarization of article body per WP:LEAD, such as follows:
Its theology combines yoga with aspects of Gaudiya Vaishnavism. The adherents have to practice vegetarianism, and avoid smoking and drinking alcohol.
Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 06:34, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We have a lot more references to work from, and of higher quality. Is this proposal supported by any of them? --Hipal (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am looking at currently cited sources.
The current statement including only "Vegetarianism" for adherants is not supported by cited sources. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 01:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"hostility" in the lead (without sources)

[edit]

The lead says: It (SIF) includes hostility toward Islam. But the cited sources do not have such strong language.

NY Times says deeply suspicious but that is not the same as hostility

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/27/us/politics/tulsi-gabbard-trump-national-intelligence.html

the Science of Identity Foundation, a secretive offshoot of the Hare Krishna movement vehemently opposed to same-sex relationships and abortion, and deeply suspicious of Islam.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/01/is-tulsi-gabbard-a-mystery/681398/

Only reference to Islam in this cited source is:

next year criticized the Democratic president’s reluctance to refer to Islamic State terrorists as “Islamic extremists.” RogerYg (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the article body, the source refers to Ex-follower (who alleges that group's teachings were often anti-Islamic).
A former member told The Independent the group’s teachings are virulently homophobic, often anti-Islamic and misogynist, and how they were forced to worship Butler, who is considered to be akin to a God.
Therefore, allegation by former member is per WP:RS source and not my personal commentary.
In my humble view, do not think an unnamed former follower in one source is sufficient to use strong language as "hostility". Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 04:23, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, hostility is a fair and close synonym of "deeply suspicious". That said, I don't particularly object to a change of the text to "deep suspicion of". What do you reckon Hipal? Cambial — foliar❧ 11:04, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't ignore sources. --Hipal (talk) 14:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The currently cited source said "deeply suspicious". Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 01:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's unclear if you see the two quotes above.[1] --Hipal (talk) 01:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As per WP:TRT, Consensus exists that TRT World is reliable for statements regarding the official views of the Turkish government but not reliable for subjects with which the Turkish government could be construed to have a conflict of interest.
TRT World may not be a reliable source on this issue, as the Turkish government is likely to have a conflict of interest on issues related to Islam.
See High Quality sources NY Times and Reuters, noting Turkish government's pro-Islam and pro-Islamist relationship.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/turkey-erdogan-education/
"Turkey’s president has said he wants to create a “pious generation” to change the nation. So the government is pouring money into schools that teach Islamic values."
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/27/opinion/turkey-istanbul-protests.html
Turkey’s drift toward Islamist extremism suggests that it could become another country that supports terrorism and threatens Israel.
Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I was aware. --Hipal (talk) 15:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"hostility" is from TRT World, which is not a reliable source on this topic,
while, "deep suspicion" is from a High quality source, NY Times,
Therefore, I think hostility should be replaced to deep suspicion.
NY Times says deeply suspicious but that is not the same as hostility
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/27/us/politics/tulsi-gabbard-trump-national-intelligence.html
a secretive offshoot of the Hare Krishna movement vehemently opposed to same-sex relationships and abortion, and deeply suspicious of Islam.
Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 05:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Islamophobic" is sourced above. --Hipal (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am fine with replacing 'hostility to Islam' with Islamophobic, as it is sourced from WP:RS reference. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 05:02, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Searching through the edit history...
https://bylinetimes.com/2019/10/03/islamophobic-world-view-of-tulsi-gabbards-guru-revealed-in-unearthed-recordings-can-she-still-run-for-president/ was used, but appears unreliable. --Hipal (talk) 15:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Howley(2019) https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/tulsi-gabbard-2020-presidential-campaign.html
Stankov, Pavel (2015-03-19). "Cronyism in Hawai'i's politics". Ka Leo O Hawaii. Retrieved 2024-10-01.
Kaneya, Rui (2015-03-16). "Krishna Cult Rumors Still Dog Tulsi Gabbard". Honolulu Civil Beat. Retrieved 2024-10-01.
Hurley, Bevan (16 May 2015). "Disciples, deities and development". www.stuff.co.nz. Retrieved 2024-10-01.</ref>
The above four were all used, and need to be reviewed as to what they verify. --Hipal (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything in the four above.
The new changes are awkward.
We should consider expanding coverage of what ex-followers have said, properly qualified. --Hipal (talk) 17:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think the changes such as adding Islamophobia are well cited with WR:RS sources, an improvement over the previous version.
Butler's teachings included condemnation of homosexuality, suspicion of Islam, Islamophobia, and skepticism of science.
I agree the statements are bit awkward in the lead, and I will try to improve grammar per WP:Readability in the lead.
Yes, we can add more details in the body per sources, but we can discuss on TALK page before any substantial change in lead. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 03:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

[edit]

To add to this article: Butler's year of birth. 98.123.38.211 (talk) 04:13, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]