Talk:Rittal

Some proposed changes

[edit]

I just edited this article by delivering a translation of the German article. As an employee of Rittal I sure have a conflict of interest, but I wasn't aware that a translation is seen as such, sorry! It would be nice if someone could have a look at my translation (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rittal&oldid=812542531) and if it is okay publish it. Thanks and sorry again, --Manuel Funk (talk) 13:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The translation is fine. I removed the claim to 11, 000 employees until secondary confirmation. That may be what the company website says, but I'm not entirely sure what metrics they're using to arrive at that number. 11,000 seems excessive. There seems to be much more on the German version. Is there more text somewhere that you'd like to add to the article? I see now where the proposed text is. Please add it here to the talk page for us to consider. When its ready, change the "answered" response in the request edit template from "yes" to "no" to reactivate your request. Danke schön  Spintendo  ᔦᔭ  04:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just added the the proposed text (see below). Thanks for having a look at it! --Manuel Funk (talk) 08:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Translated Version of German Article

[edit]


Rewritten version of German translation

[edit]

Rewritten version issues

[edit]

Above you'll find my rewrite of your translation. Please note that the headings were removed from both versions, in order to maintain this talk page's heading structure in the table of contents. Although this is a translation of material that is already available on the German Wikipedia, the policies and procedures for conflict of interest editing on the English Wikipedia are stricter in some aspects, while the requirements for references are almost always stricter. Thus, some material available in the German version may not be so in the English version. See Translating German Wikipedia for more information.

  • Some issues that arose over this translation:
    • It was unclear how Rittal got its name. You wrote that it took letters from a city, but it's unclear from the letters that you wrote, where in the city's name, they came from. Please clarify.
    • Please clarify what it is that the company makes; and as a manufacturer, whom do they make it for. For example, under "products" you have food service. Does this mean Rittal makes food? Or does it mean that they provide the staffing to serve food?
    • Process industry - this has no equivalent in the English language, except for process servers who are connected to the legal industry.
    • What you've titled "Awards" and I've titled "Industry recognition" needs better sourcing. I deleted anything that wasnt cited. Ostensibly that leaves only two awards left, and they both cite Rittal. Unless there are references from some other source, none of the stricken out material will be added.
    • What is the significance of the Haiger plant? The explanation describing its purpose is confusing. Unless this can be expounded upon in an understandable way, it will likely be added in only a cursory manner, i.e., "The company opened a new facility in Haiger on such and such date."

 Spintendo  ᔦᔭ  18:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your work and information! I will have a deeper look at it when I have more time. But about your first point I thought this was clear by highlighting the letters by showing them in italics: The name Rittal is derived from the places where the company was founded – Rittershausen in Dietzhölztal. --Manuel Funk (talk) 09:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I now made some changes to the rewritten version: I found sources to most of the awards, deleted the unclear part about the Haiger plant and added the part about the origin of the name "Rittal" with better highlighting of the letters. Next I will try to clarify the unclear parts about the products. --Manuel Funk (talk) 10:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I now rewrote the part about the products. I hope the article now is okay to publish and would very much appreciate it, if someone (Spintendo?) could do it! --Manuel Funk (talk) 13:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply quotebox with inserted reviewer feedback 30-JAN-2018

[edit]

Below you will see where text from your draft has been quoted and individual feedback related comments have been inserted underneath each major proposal.


Regarding the Awards section, I apologize for asking for better references from you for these, which you did indeed provide in some cases. I really shouldn't have though, because in the end, these types of sections are usually problematic even with references. Industry related awards are, like many award systems in the business sector, based on a highly subjective set of criteria. This criterion and the standards and methadology used in its awarding is not usually disclosed here for people to see, keeping the contents and conventions of these particular awards and those who bestow them hidden from view. Perhaps what I should have asked for were references stating how and why these awards are significant to this industry. This along with references for the products and sponsorships is all that is needed now. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 15:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I deleted the Awards section. Regarding the Locations section: a collapsable table listing of cities would be really nice, but should we include a selection of locations or all our location, like in the Bansard International article? I think this would be a really big table. Here are all our locations: https://www.rittal.com/de-de/content/de/unternehmen/produktionssttten/rittal_weltweit.jsp. These are only the countries. In some countries we have more than one factory. --Manuel Funk (talk) 12:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Location table

[edit]
Rittal locations
Region Country Cities
Europe Albania Tirana
Austria Lauterach
Linz
Seiersberg
Vienna
Belarus Minsk
Belgium Lokeren
Bosnia Banja Luka
Mostar
Sarajevo
Bulgaria Sofia
Croatia Zagreb
Czech Republic Zdiby
Denmark Vallensbæk Strand
Estonia Talinn
Finland Vantaa
France Paris
Germany Bad Krozingen
Bietigheim-Bissingen
Dietzhölztal
Eschenburg
Essen
Garching
Gera
Haiger
Herborn
Quickborn
Quierschied
Greece Athens
Hungary Budapest
Iceland Reykjavik
Ireland Carlow
Italy Vignate
Latvia Riga
Lithuania Vilnius
Luxembourg Ehlerange
Macedonia Skopje
Montenegro Podgorica
Netherlands Zevenaar
Norway Ski
Poland Warszawa
Portugal Rio Meão
Romania Otopeni
Russia Moscow
Serbia Beograd
Slovakia Bratislava
Slovenia Ljubljana
Spain Barcelona
Sweden Ängelholm
 Switzerland Neuenhof
Yverdon-les-Bains
Turkey Istanbul
Ukraine Kiev
United Kingdom Hellaby
Asia-Pacific Australia Miranda
China Hong Kong
Shanghai
India Doddaballapur
Indonesia Jakarta
Japan Yokohama
Kazakhstan Almaty
Malaysia Selangor
New Zealand Wellington
Philippines Makati City
Singapore Singapore
South Korea Busan
Incheon
Taiwan Taipei
Thailand Bangkok
Vietnam Ho Chi Minh City
North America Canada Mississauga
Mexico Mexico City
USA Schaumburg
Central America Costa Rica Heredia
El Salvador San Salvador
Guatemala Guatemala City
Honduras San Pedro Sula
Nicaragua Managua
Trinidad and Tobago San Fernando
South America Argentina Buenos Aires
Bolivia Santa Cruz de la Sierra
Brazil São Paulo
Chile Las Condes
Colombia Bogotá
Peru Lima
Venezuela Caracas
Middle East/Africa Israel Caesarea
Nigeria Lagos
South Africa Johannesburg
United Arab Emirates Dubai

Instructions

[edit]

The list is shown above. You can see that the list is half-done, and yet it still remains compact in size even when uncollapsed. It autohides here on the talkpage only. In the article space its behavior would be to default open. However, if it is felt that auotocollapsed must be done, there are additional steps which can be taken. For now, you'll need to just finish the list. FYI the formatting may be difficult as far as the numbering of alotted spaces, if you're not familiar with this kind of table. When it's completed open a new edit request template and I can then move it to the article space. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 10:40, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Spintendo for your work on the locations list. I just completed it. --Manuel Funk (talk) 16:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Current draft version as of 14-FEB-2018

[edit]

This version still requires at least one reference each to be placed in the products, locations[a] and sponsorships sections. As this version is perfectly minimalistic, I will accept references coming from the company itself. Those are the only obstacles left before having this version finally replace the current standing article. Spintendo      19:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ For the location table, the reference can be placed after the words "including the following".


One additional point to clarify. Under Locations it states "Production takes place at 13 facilities, including the following:" It then lists several cities of locations. Does production take place in all of these cities? If this is a list of production facilities then the list needs to be focused on only production facilities. Please clarify. Spintendo      09:09, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted the part "including the following:". The list contains all of our subsidiaries and production facilities and most of our sales and logistics centres. --Manuel Funk (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that. It might just be best to describe what occurs at these locations. You said "The list contains all of our subsidiaries and production facilities and most of our sales and logistics centres. If you could just add that to the draft version and maybe explain briefly the differences. I'm trying to proactively address any concerns other editors might likely have with this list, and making sure we describe what this list is "listing" is a good idea. Thanks Spintendo      06:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see that volume production is listed for the cities where that takes place. Could you also describe what takes place at the remaining sites? Each site should indicate its importance to Rittal, or else the information might be deemed as not necessary and removed. Please advise. Spintendo      02:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Spintendo! I just edited the intro text above the locations table. I hope the term "sales locations" is enough to describe what is happening at the locations where no volume production takes place. --Manuel Funk (talk) 12:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This looks good. The only thing we need now are references for this information. I will implement the list of factories and the sponsorships, as those are things which traditionally have been allowed for the company itself to reference. If you can think of any other references those would be helpful. Thank you!  Spintendo      13:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of the existing reference [1] which is from a company website (rittal.co.uk), one could use http://www.friedhelm-loh-group.com/en/unternehmensgruppe/rittal.asp. This is from the website of our mother company. Perhaps this is better then a reference from the company's website and not a COI?! The mentioned website could also be used as a reference for the foundation date. For what else information references are needed? --Manuel Funk (talk) 14:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've added that link to the External links section.  Spintendo      00:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]