Talk:Mount Redoubt

The good article status of this article is being reassessed to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. ^Date: 00:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

	Mount Redoubt has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 12, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
	A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 24, 2009.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes High‑importance Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Alaska High‑importance Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Mountains Mid‑importance Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Article review

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, especially about the 2009 eruption. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:46, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Mount Redoubt

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result pending

Lots of uncited statements, especially about the 2009 eruption. Z1720 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: I added details and cleaned up a bunch of uncited statements about the 2009 eruption. If there are other portions that need citations, could you mark them with {{cn}}? Otherwise, does it look good to you? — hike395 (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]