Talk:LinkedIn

research self-promotion

[edit]

The parts on research should be checked for relevance. Wikipedia should not be a tool for self-promotion of researchers. I don't think academic work (even working papers are mentioned here) should be listed here without proof of relevance, for example via some measure of high quality academic citations or uptake in reliable media sources. SovielHungerhabichgarnicht (talk) 02:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy issues with the apps

[edit]

The article doesn't mention the privacy issues with the apps:

https://www.seattletimes.com/business/technology/linkedin-sued-for-spying-on-users-with-apple-device-apps/ https://www.theverge.com/2012/6/6/3067508/linkedin-ios-calendar-privacy-concerns-response-updated-app Whatisbetter (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Wiki Education assignment: Social Informatics - ITI 200 Section 06

[edit]

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2025 and 10 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alpkbernardo (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Salinafiaz (talk) 20:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Latter flagged

[edit]

Hi, the lead/infobox shows conflicting LinkedIn user numbers (1B members vs. 310M MAU, with the latter flagged “unreliable”) — should this be clarified or updated with a better source?

Salinafiaz (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reyes (2022)

[edit]

Tiktok and Academic correlation? 49.149.199.94 (talk) 01:32, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]