Talk:Learning crisis

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information. This article was accepted from this draft on 1 January 2023 by reviewer Pichemist (talk · contribs). Education Low‑importance Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Low‑importance Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. JesitaRISE (talk · contribs) has been paid by Research on Improving Systems of Edcuation (RISE). COI disclosed on userpage.

Article Title

Hi, just wondering if you think a date, country or region may be good-practice in the article title?

For example, 'Global learning crisis' or 'Learning crisis of 2022' is more informational and may help to get the article approved.

- Ashleyknowsthings (talk) 13:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is this article biased?

@UtherSRG: This article has a POV cleanup tag: is it not written from a neutral point of view? Jarble (talk) 21:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think well enough. It has a bunch of other issues. Do you agree? Get them cleaned up, and I would expect it would read better and more neutral. UtherSRG (talk) 01:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]