Talk:Judgment (disambiguation)

Missing reference to Judgement page

I checked HTML code and links from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Judgement - there is NO reference to Judgement page. I'm not english-native, so could please someone add missing reference? Metallserge (talk) 19:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Metallserge: I'm not sure what the issue is. Judgment redirects to judgement, there is a hatnote pointing back here, so everything seems to be in order. 🤷 Paradoctor (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ah, you right, first link (which is just Judgment as text, but pointing to Judgment (decision making) ) actually redirects to Judgement. Metallserge (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pages that link to "judgment" need to use the redirect because the term "judgment" is ambiguous, in order to clarify which meaning is the intended target. Paradoctor (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 December 2025

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Judgment (disambiguation) → Judgement
Judgement → Judgement (virtue)

– Judgement is a term general enough that I think it would be best to delete the article and move this disambiguation page there instead. See similar cases such as decision, temper, play, and pause. Semisalsa (talk) 15:22, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The intention of my move request has changed since I submitted it on December 10, as I no longer suggest deleting Judgement. I propose to move the current Judgement article to Judgement (virtue) and this disambig page to Judgement. Please see Talk:Judgement for more in-depth reasons why.Semisalsa (talk) 16:32, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this request conflicted with the request at Talk:Judgement. That proposal has been added here. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 15:37, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural oppose WP:RM is not used to discuss article deletion; see WP:AFD. 162 etc. (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I had already added the Judgement article to AFD, but it was removed and I was told to create a request for move instead. I'm not sure which to do? Is there a kind of discussion for the type of appropriate discussion to create? Semisalsa (talk) 17:42, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgement for convenience. Skynxnex (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that OP has not made a real argument for deletion (WP:DEL#REASON) at either thread. @Semisalsa: I urge you to carefully read the deletion policy, find good policy-based reasons why Judgement does not deserve an article, and resubmit to AFD. If that finds consensus, we can then decide what to do with the title of Judgment (disambiguation). 162 etc. (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closest reason would be WP:CFORK, I suppose. The current Judgement article is essentially already a disambiguation page, with sections for the use of the term in various fields.

I'm bringing this up as it's difficult to see why Judgement deserves its own article and not decision, meaning, pause, way, tense, etc. which are all in the category of general terms which are used differently in different fields and contexts. Semisalsa (talk) 18:13, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll bring this up in a new AFD submission for Judgement Semisalsa (talk) 18:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]