Talk:Interstate 59 in Mississippi

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Mississippi Mid‑importance U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Types Interstate Highway System Locations Mississippi Notes and alerts This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. United States: Mississippi United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi.

Untitled

Any comments or questions regarding I-59 in La. or Miss. are now welcomed. --Bdj95 05:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, talk pages on Wikipedia are intended to discuss the article – ways to improve the article, clarifications when the text is unclear, that sort of thing. It's not for general questions about the subject. -- NORTH ^talk 18:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scope: should Louisiana and Mississippi be combined?

About six months ago, this article was created, combining the two states because there is very little in Louisiana. NE2 recently made the companion Interstate 59 in Alabama and Georgia; I-59 is similarly short in Georgia. Scott5114 then decided that this was a bad idea, and moved them to cover Mississippi and Alabama only, arguing that the other states can be covered in Interstate 59. NE2 disagrees, saying that it makes sense to be consistent and cover all four states in subpages.

I think I agree with Scott. His idea is the most consistent and practical. If a particular state's stretch of interstate highway is long enough and / or important enough to warrant its own article then of course it should get one. Sometimes just one city's stretch of interstate is important enough to justify its own article (like Atanta's Downtown Connector, for instance). But if a state (or a city) interstate's features can be summed up, substantially, in one or two paragraphs then I should think it could be covered in the parent article (in this case Interstate 59). Berberry (talk) 19:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger request!

Hello! I’d like to emphasize the fact that the segment of the interstate in Louisiana is simply too short, so the page should be merged into this page. What do you think? 2601:C6:D200:8AB0:6490:7DA:E4C1:70E7 (talk) 06:37, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose—I'm opposed another one of these clumsy mergers. The article here has sufficient content to stand on its own, and that is the metric we use, not the length of the highway segment. Imzadi 1979 → 07:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]