Talk:Intermodal container

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Packaging This article is within the scope of WikiProject Packaging, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of containers, packaging, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Occupational Safety and Health Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Trains High‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Transport: Maritime High‑importance Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as High-importance). Trucks High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Trade Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Series 1

The article is about ISO Series 1 containers (it redirects from ISO Series 1 containers), without indicating what 'Series 1' relates to. Are there other series, perhaps an update to the standards? If there are no other series, the article ought to indicate this. FreeFlow99 (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

9 ft 6+1⁄2 in high containers

I have seen 9 ft 6+1⁄2 in (2,908 mm) high containers as well as 9 ft 6 in (2,896 mm). Peter Horn User talk 04:10, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Log cradle container

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

Make Log cradle container a section of Intermodal container Peter Horn User talk 23:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The current structure seems to work as it is. Klbrain (talk) 22:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article issues and classification

Greeting, Sometimes things happen. This article currently does not pass the B-class criteria. There is a Nov 2021 "This section does not cite any sources" tag and an inline "Citations needed" (Jan 2022) tag. These need addressing to circumvent article reassessment. The "See also" section seems bloated. Three links in the "External links" section, possibly four with consensus, but seven is too many per WP:LINKFARM and needs trimming per WP:ELPOINTS #3. -- Otr500 (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Reassess the article per fails B-class criteria. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]