Talk:Everyone's Talking (band)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Everyone's Talking (band) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
| On 18 November 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Everyone's Talking. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Everyone's Talking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100220093859/http://www.promos4awareness.com:80/2010/02/interview-everyones-talking/ to http://www.promos4awareness.com/2010/02/interview-everyones-talking
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 18 November 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:23, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Everyone's Talking (band) → Everyone's Talking – Only other work by this name has an exclamation point in the title. I feel that is significant enough of a distinction, given no other works with "Everyone's Talking" have an article; compare Anyway the Wind Blows versus any other "Any Way the Wind Blows" title, or Jeopardy! versus anything else with "Jeopardy" in the name. The backlinks are kind of a mess right now, however. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Justified primary redirect. The Canadian band is barely notable, barely gets any traffic, and is not the primary topic. Note also that the album title does not have the "!" in all sources, for example NME. I've added a hatnote; nothing further is needed here. 162 etc. (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose what is the advantage to anyone of removing (band)? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:32, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
- Strong oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS this normally only works when there is the addition of a detail rather than the absence of it. Per MOS:TM things like exclamation marks are often omitted from titles anyway so readers would probably expect the album to be at this title as well. The band has 13 views (plus 32 from the former title) compared with 3,686[[1]] for the album. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)




