Talk:Electric utility

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Business Low‑importance Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Untitled

Page renamed to "Electric Utility." L3prador 22:25, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am a little uncomfortable with the power transactions section. It seems to meander between the control of electrical networks and the retailing of electricity. Lumberjack Steve 11:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight and Alternative Energies

Oversight and Alternative Energies section added J. Chow 11:58 9 December 2016

I thought that this article was a bit lacking and so I decided to add sections in regard to oversight and alternative energies. The existing topics like executive compensation was kind of hard to confirm with other references because transparency is apparently not a very prominent part of many electric utility companies which is understandable due to how necessary these companies are to countries infrastructure. I thought that information on oversight would provide more insight into why different areas have differing structures. I also thought that it is important to note green energy as green energy, being relatively new and all and how their structures are different due to public perception. Overall, there is much more to electric utilities but a lot of it is still controversial and are hard to confirm. J. Chow 11:58 9 December 2016

External links modified (September 2025)

Hello fellow editors,

I have just modified 2 external links on Electric utility. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170320005200/http://snavely-king.com/page/regulated-electric to http://snavely-king.com/page/regulated-electric
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20190411215858/http://www.science.smith.edu/~jcardell/Readings/uGrid/ElecPwrSys%20Operations/EPS_Overview_EIA.pdf to http://www.science.smith.edu/~jcardell/Readings/uGrid/ElecPwrSys%20Operations/EPS_Overview_EIA.pdf

Please refer to the FaQ for information on correcting errors with the bot.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]