Talk:Duke Nukem Forever: Restoration Project

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 (nom)
Zhongli (Genshin Impact) (nom)
Megaton (Fallout 3) (nom)
Halo 5: Guardians (nom)
Eric Tolt (start)
Smeargle (start)
Genshin Impact (start)
Kersploosh! (start)
Road 96 (nom)
Sokoban (start)
Xiao (Genshin Impact) (nom)
Koyori (start)
X-It (start)
Anno 117 (start)
Angry Birds Star Wars (start)
Super Kirby Clash (start)
Trauma Center (video game series) (start)
Crash Bandicoot (start)
Floating Runner: Quest for the 7 Crystals (start)
Easy Delivery Co. (start)
When the Past Was Around (nom)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Change of title

I think it would be better to move this to Duke Nukem Forever 2001 as the cancelled build is what appears to be notable, not the fan restoration project. The build appears to have some pretty lengthy reviews even ignoring the restoration project, such as this. It's more of a Resident Evil 1.5 situation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:19, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Duke Nukem Forever 2001" is not a fan-made title. They just called it that way, and you can contact them to change that name. LakerMakerBaker606 (talk) 09:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I meant changing the scope of the article to the build instead of the fan project.

The fan project is clearly not notable, so if it's not changed, this article will probably be merged or deleted. This is the only choice here IMO if you want the article to remain intact. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:20, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]