Talk:CAM (clade)
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cladogram
[edit]Someone that knows how to add Cladogram please add one. Thank you! Also thanks to @User:Chaotic Enby for being a good contributor to this page! :D also my old username was Emmanuelbruh I changed it to this. Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 23:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have a pointer to data for creating the cladogram? - UtherSRG (talk) 00:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- What is ‘pointer to data’? I do not know what that is. Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 00:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Where do you expect us to find the information with which to create the cladogram? - UtherSRG (talk) 00:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- What is ‘pointer to data’? I do not know what that is. Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 00:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Regarding the data, Section 3.1 appears to have a good cladogram that could be referenced for that purpose. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 07:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Also the data can be used in my other page Pancryptista too! Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 20:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Also please create the Cladogram, im not even a teen I had to learn how to make auto taxobox I ain’t learning how to make a cladogram. Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 21:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed the cladogram right after I posted this lol Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 21:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Cladogram 2.0
[edit]we need to add a cladogram for outside relations ie external phylogeny, maybe including the SAR and haptista? maybe similar to the Diaphoretickes cladogram. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Interested inTaxonomy (talk • contribs)
External Phylogeny
[edit]We need to add a cladogram for outside relations, as in external phylogeny. Maybe it can be similar to the cladogram in the Diaphoretickes page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Interested inTaxonomy (talk • contribs)
Spelling
[edit]Should it be mentioned as CAM or Cam? Sar is officially spelled Sar except when explaining the acronym, so should CAM/Cam have the same? Interested inTaxonomy (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- It should be CAM. Because the name SAR was proposed in this article, and ISOP proposed the Sar name in this article. But "Cam" was never proposed. Jako96 (talk) 10:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- Like Jako96 said. Sar is the name given to SAR in its formal taxonomic description, while CAM is still not a formal taxon. — Snoteleks (talk) 11:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed. ISOP does not recognise such taxa as formal. Jako96 (talk) 11:48, 1 August 2025 (UTC)