While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
@Kovcszaln6 Thank you for the revision! I must say that as a non-native speaker who made an AI-assisted translation (checking sentence by sentence if the meaning had remained the same and using three different AIs and carefully comparing the results, but still), the issue that I feared the most was the English level of the article. If everything is ok from that side, it's really a great news for me. What I also find remarkable is this attention to the sources. On it.wiki (my home wiki) I'm currently fighting tooth and nail just for make the community accept the idea that primary, secondary and tertiary sources must be used in different ways and for different aims, it's almost moving to see that there's somewhere in the wikimedia environment where people still use sources carefully and with encyclopedic rigour, so thank you!
Getting to the point of the review:
YouTube video: that sentence is almost completely referenced by the two other sources. The tagesspiegel references in 2023, the neo-Nazi demonstration was formally banned by Hungarian authorities but took place anyway [...] giving Nazi salutes [...] the neo-Nazi demonstrators assaulted journalists present, two of whom were injured to the head. Later that evening, the neo-Nazi militants reportedly went also into the city center to attack left-wing counter-demonstrators. The Faz references in the green area of Városmajor. So, the only thing that is referenced by democ is wearing SS and Wehrmacht uniforms. The reason why I added that video is first of all that it's the source of that part of the Tagesspiegel article (or rather, it's directly incorporated in the article), so the Tagesspiegel's journalists have apparently deemed it as a reliable source regarding the reconstruction of the events. In the video there is a more thorough account of what happened, with images and so on, so I thought that it was a good supplementary material for the article. I also added that detail about the uniforms because IMHO it is relevant in the following controversy between the alleged attackers and the Hungarian authorities about how the victims were chosen. If you think that is necessary though I can remove both the source and the detail about the uniforms.
Tageszeitung: I don't really agree with that assessment, but most importantly, another more recent scholar analysis seems to show very different results: in the ranking at page 444 Die Tageszeitung ranks third, getting 7.3 points out of ten (with the first one being the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung with 7.4 out of ten). Generally speaking, it'd be extremely difficult to replace it. Die Tageszeitung is a left-leaning newspaper, and these are the newspapers which have paid more attention to all the different phases of these trials (the same applies for il manifesto in Italy). Of course I've paid attention to take out possible NNPOV remarks out of these sources and keeping to the facts, especially in the cases in which I have seen that there was some controversy that didn't seem really relevant to me for this article (for example I've left out the assertion that Maja T. is "in confinment", a lexical choice that was criticized by conservative newspapers like Die Welt).
