This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Brazil was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Tourism in Brazil was copied or moved into Brazil with this edit on 29 October 2008. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Other talk page banners
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2010, when it received 6,785,350 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please organize the "Religion" portion in descending order (based on the percentages), as right now "no religion" is below lower percentages.
Please fix the organization of the "Ethnic groups" portion, as right now "Pardo" is above "White" even though it has a lower percentage. 187.106.36.229 (talk) 02:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Partly done: for religion, to match the pie chart. Left Pardo unchanged since it does have a higher percentage (45.3 vs 43.5)
I think it was already discussed here, but the official language name label should be simply "Portuguese", with a link to "Brazilian Portuguese" to clarify; the Brazilian Constitution states in its Chapter III, Article 13.: "The Portuguese language is the official language of the Federative Republic of Brazil. DanGFSouza (talk) 10:47, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, the constitution and any laws relating to language only mention "Portuguese", not "Brazilian Portuguese". Obviously that can be the target, but the label should be Portuguese alone. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
There are way too many images on the right side, which creates a huge blank space between Urbanization and Race and Ethnicity sections. Thence, I suggest moving the Rock art at Serra da Capivara National Park image to the left, on the Pre-Cabraline era section, the painting of Emperor Pedro II to the Independent Empire section (it is currently in the early republic), remove entirely the photos of Presidents Lula and Trump and that of the 17th BRICS summit logo, as it doesn't fit anything really on the article. Other than that, I'd remove one of the geography images (there's simply too many images) and the construction of Brasilia photo (which, from all the historic images, is the less relevant ). If not removing, some of those images should be passed to the left side of the article.
ETQueEsteveEmVarginha (talk) 17:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC) ETQueEsteveEmVarginha (talk) 17:16, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
Partly done: for religion, to match the pie chart. Left Pardo unchanged since it does have a higher percentage (45.3 vs 43.5)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.