Talk:American Sign Language

Good articleAmerican Sign Language has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 13, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
September 8, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Linquist William Stokoe

[edit]

I don't believe William (bill) Stokoe was a Linquist. He certainly was not hired as Linquist when he started his work at Gallaudet. He was hired as an English teacher. So when he first saw Sign Language it wasn't through the lens of a linguist it was as an English teacher. He studied with two Linquist while Gallaudet which was part of his interest in the language. I don't believe he had a degree in linguistics therefor I don't think he could be identified as Linquist William Stokoe.

The redirect A.s.l. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 12 § A.s.l. until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article review

[edit]

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed that there were a lot of uncited statements in the "Morphology" section. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

Lots of uncited statements in the "Morphology" section. Z1720 (talk) 02:57, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems most of the uncited material was added in this one edit in April 2023. Maybe someone more knowledgeable about ASL or more familiar with the sourcing could try rescuing some of that, but if not it could just be deleted. Erinius (talk) 12:58, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted it. Erinius (talk) 14:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Erinius: Thanks for doing that. There are a couple of other uncited statements in the article. Would you be willing to look at those? If you'd like I can add citation needed templates to the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]