Talk:Allison Lanier

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Allison Lanier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 03:41, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OmegaAOL (talk · contribs) 23:57, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

On hold, reassesment.

  • Thank you for dealing with my erroneous quick fail.
  • I understand the image issue, so you pass Criterion 6. You also pass Criterion 5, 4, 2, and 1 upon analysis and some of my own copy-editing.
  • For criterion 3, I think that there are WP:RS available which go into greater detail on her personal life. Would you like me to assist you by finding links?
  • For criterion 2b, I am currently conducting a spot-check.
Hey, thank you so much! Regarding the personal life, I have been unable to find anymore sources, although I did find this [1] which has more info on her early life? I will add it later today. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:09, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@OmegaAOL: Is everything okay? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]