Talk:Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song)

Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 10, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Electronic music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Afraid (2hollis and Nate Sib song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 23:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:06, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will review! Arconning (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for picking this up! Locust member (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member Here are my short comments. :) Arconning (talk) 02:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the short n' sweet review! Done most with a comment on one. Locust member (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

• Mentions of " cloud rap, electropop, EDM." should be changed to " cloud rap, electropop, and EDM."
  • whooooops,  Done Locust member (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox

• "commentary of the duo's ", "commentary on the duo's "
  •  Done Locust member (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• For the infobox, I believe it would use 2hollis' professional moniker rather than his legal name as that is how it's stated in the credits.
  •  Done Locust member (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Background and release

• All good! Quite well written for me. :)

Composition

• No issues. All good.

Critical reception and the rest

• Just a comma after "Reed"!
  • Not sure how it would work in this sentence. Reed, said "you might just hear it in a strobe-lit arena one day". is not grammatically correct. Locust member (talk) 22:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Must be an error from me, probably was slowly slipping away from tiredness lol Arconning (talk) 07:07, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Media

• Image used is on a free-use license. All good.

Refs

• Earwig's all good. Will do an in depth source review as there's few.

• [1] The Face, all good.
• [2] Pitchfork, all good.
• [3] HotNewHipHop, all good. Was skeptical about the among others part but the source literally says that lol.
• [4] Uproxx, all good.
• [5] Hypebeast, all good.
• [6] Consequence, all good.
• [7] Consequence, all good.
• [8] Apple Music, quite alright.
• [9] triple j, all good.
• [10] The Face, all good.
• [11] Uproxx, all good.
• [12] Hypebeast, all good.

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, broad enough information, neutral.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.