Talk:3D mousepad
Note on sources
[edit]Acknowledging here for transparancy that this article draws from sources used by the Pixiv Enclyclopedia article on oppai mousepads, which itself does not qualify as a reliable source but I believe the sources it uses do qualify as reliable. That article also mentions the "Babepad", a 3D mousepad produced by the Danish company AMGlobal in 1999;[1], I have not included it in this article as I cannot find any secondary sources discussing it. Morgan695 (talk) 16:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by JuniperChill talk 09:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- ... that mousepads resembling breasts and buttocks (example pictured) have been sold for over $200?
Morgan695 (talk) 17:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC).
Overall, the article is new enough (created on 8 April), is long enough, is NPOV, hook is cited to a RS and QPQ is done. Earwig shows a "violation unlikely" result with 2.0% similarity. Interesting article/subject and one that I would've thought would have been covered on Wikipedia a long time ago already. Cattos💭 01:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion about merging this article into mousepad at: Talk:Mousepad#Proposed_merge_of_3D_mousepad_into_Mousepad, Rjjiii (talk) 03:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Just sending this to unapproved pending resolution of merge discussion. Kingsif (talk) 01:04, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- Is there any remedy here other than to wait out the potentially months it will take for this merge discussion to be resolved? It's been open for a few weeks now and discussion has been pretty limited. Morgan695 (talk) 17:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging RoySmith for input regarding the above question. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:52, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hmmm, not sure why I'm particularly qualified to have an opinion on this one, but yeah, we need to wait for the merge discussion to end. And since I was made aware of it, I agree that it should be merged. RoySmith (talk) 10:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging RoySmith for input regarding the above question. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:52, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Is there any remedy here other than to wait out the potentially months it will take for this merge discussion to be resolved? It's been open for a few weeks now and discussion has been pretty limited. Morgan695 (talk) 17:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Given that the merger discussion will take this nomination beyond the two-months mark, and how it seems unlikely this will survive that discussion, I am marking this for closure per WP:DYKTIMEOUT. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:52, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)