This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
The US is now a life+70 although there are residual hang-overs from previous (c) regimes. That should be mentioned. Also, even if you do not want to list every work that will fall out of copyright in the US, the use of paragraphs rather than tables makes that section harder to read. A table could be called "Major works ..." or something, but there should be tables. Lamona (talk) 04:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tables for the US will only add unnecessary kilobytes to the already large size of the article. Compiling tables for the life + 50 sections of this and later years' articles is trouble enough! -- SethAllen623 (talk) 07:11, July 4, 2025 (UTC)