Talk:2025 Bihar Legislative Assembly election

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2025

[edit]

@Kalpesh Manna 2002@Sachin126@Davemck and others, User:Vikashchy8 is continuously trying to promote Jan Suraaj Party. Besides he is trying to impose his edits over others. He is also accused of hijacking other page as revealed in his talk page. Please discuss the matter here. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He is fewer know in case of politics of Bihar and moving content as like own legislative assembly Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kalpesh Manna 2002, @Sachin126, @Davemck, Vikashchy8's words clearly indicate disruptive edits and personal attacks without being collaborative. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not showing what you are saying, I am doing what is correct Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mr XYZ we have not a personal war so discuss about matter there are 2 matter disclose now 1st Jan Suraaj Party as above section and 2nd left front of communist party. I think read more articles and reply me Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Under MGB, CPI(ML)L, CPI, CPI(M) are often together called Left Front/Left parties/The Left. (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/rjd-gets-26-congress-9-lf-5-in-bihar-mahagathbandhan-seat-deal/articleshow/108884827.cms) (https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/bihar-election-results-left-parties-leading-in-18-of-29-seats-say-trends-on-expected-lines/story-LrvJMEkwKuENpxFLBOpA4O.html) (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/india-bloc-mahagathbandhan-seat-sharing-agreement-bihar-rjd-congress-left-parties-lok-sabha-polls-2520683-2024-03-29) XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And regarding Jan Suraaj Party, let the other editors make their opinion here. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
alliance and sub-alliance just remember INDIA alliance in all state one current case APP and INC 2025 delhi legislative assembly Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
what about Jan Suraaj Party Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting you not change jan suraaj you have no knowledge Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, be polite. Your words do not seem neutral. I have already written about discussion. See properly. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Balanced statement Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think matter is shorted for jan Suraaj Party why you changed Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Vikashchy8 Besides Jan Suraaj is added. As it is not a major contender, it is not added separately. Besides I can see that User:Sachin126 told you not to add Jan Suraaj at top and to be neutral. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is major contender among even BJP bihar Vikashchy8 (talk) 06:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your words are clearly biased. Be neutral according to Wikipedia policies. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are king of your kingdom Vikashchy8 (talk) 07:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Vikashchy8 Let the other editors discuss. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Jan Suraaj Party is a newly formed political party and is not yet recognized as a state party by the Election Commission of India. However, due to the media coverage the Jan Suraaj Party is receiving, it can be placed at the top of the list in the "Others" section. Portraying the JSP as a main contender by placing it at the top of the "Parties and Alliances" section above the NDA and Mahagathbandhan is unacceptable. Sachin126 (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sachin126, Vikashchy8 still continue to impose his edits. He has already broken 3 Revert Rule. Besides his words do not seem neutral and are definitely not polite and are somewhat personal attacks. Can you please make an appeal for blocking his edits? Actually I forgot how to do that and I am unable to find the page where the appeal should be made. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You can report it here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Sachin126 (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ordering of parties

[edit]

I noticed Jordan Logs (talk · contribs) recently reordered the list of parties with a fairly inflammatory edit summary. I do not see a discussion or consensus for it so have reverted it.

Jordan, you need to discuss things with other editors or you will be blocked for edit warring. Soni (talk) 08:53, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can the Special Intensive Revision by the Election Commission be added as a controversy?

[edit]

"The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has triggered a major political controversy in Bihar", according to this article by New Indian Express. I think the time has come to add SIR as a controversy to the Wikipedia article and update as it progresses.

I would like to know if there are any objections before adding this. If we have consensus, I would like to welcome others to add about the SIR (no need to wait for me). ParanormalRat (talk) 19:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:53, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 October 2025

[edit]

Pls show the candidates of JAN SURAAJ PARTY Asdasdbfgg (talk) 10:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Only candidates of major parties/alliances as per WP:RS are shown in the Candidates section. See MOS:INDELECT. Dhruv edits (talk) 10:34, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As Per your own Sources -
Wikipedia:Reliable sources - "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered"
Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure - "Only those parties that are covered by Reliable Media as a major contender for winning that election are listed in the candidate list."
Both of these statements hold true for the Jan Suraaj Party.
Jan Suraaj Party in Bihar is a majority or a SIGNIFICANT minority view and Jan Suraaj Party is being covered by Reliable media as a major contender for winning the elections. Asdasdbfgg (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mahagathbandhan candidates contesting in same constituencies

[edit]

There are about 10 constituencies (Vaishali, Tarapur, Bachwara, Gaura-Bauram, Lalganj, Rajapakar, Rosera, Kahalgaon, Sikandara and Biharsharif) where Mahagathbandhan candidates are competing against each other. So, we should add multiple candidates for Mahagathbandhan to Candidates section for these constituencies until someone withdraws their candidature. 1 2 3. Dhruv edits (talk) 06:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Suraaj Party is missing from the list of candidates

[edit]

Jan Suraaj Party has released the names of 115 candidates however in the list of candidates their names are missing. They need to be included because this time JSP is also an important political force. Aditya 181104 (talk) 17:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 October 2025

[edit]
202.78.235.68 (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC) TO EDIT JAN SURAJ AND MAHAGATHBAN CANDIDATE LIST LET ME EDIT[reply]
 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you. Day Creature (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Someone pls Add all the candidates of Jan Suraaj Party. 116 were announced in 2 press conferences and few have been given individually over the days. Jan Suraaj Party is an important political force this election and the candidates need to be tabled properly. Asdasdbfgg (talk) 09:03, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 October 2025

[edit]

Change X to Y AetheriaScribe (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Day Creature (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 October 2025

[edit]

Again you removed other parties candidate list like jan suraj, TPP. On Wikipedia all the information should be available, if you can't provide allow us to edit it. 2405:201:4084:2009:7B6D:543F:CD47:BB23 (talk) 09:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Day Creature (talk) 15:21, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 October 2025

[edit]

Change the seats contested for Jan Suraj Party from 116 to 239 Aditya 181104 (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aditya 181104  Not done: Please provide references from reliable sources for the above change requested. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:01, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Many statements from Prashant Kishor after the date of nomination has ended, confirm that Jan Suraj Party is contesting on all 240 seats(3 have withdrawn). Further on the Election Commission website, the election affidavits of candidates of Jan Suraaj Party are present on 240 constituencies. What other reliable sources would you like? Aditya 181104 (talk) 21:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JDU Candidate for Amour

[edit]

Change to Saba Zafar from Sabbir ali Gemtile (talk) 08:17, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gemtile (talk)  Done. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Suraaj Seats Contested

[edit]

Pls, change the seats contested for Jan Suraj Party from 116 to 240. The number of Candidates contesting from the party are 240 according to election commission's Candidate Affidavit Management Website - https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/ Asdasdbfgg (talk) 04:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JJD in mahagathbandhan

[edit]

Don't add JJD in mgb, as it is already in others section. Just add a note mgb supporting JJD in one seat. Gemtile (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 October 2025

[edit]

"One of the jan shakti Janata dal candidate has been included in the mahagatbandhan alliance, please remove it, as the above said party is contesting the election without getting inside in any alliance" 2405:201:9009:B053:FEC2:DCB2:50CE:96C8 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Day Creature (talk) 20:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 October 2025

[edit]

Change: Bihar Assembly Elections subsection currently states that Jan Suraaj is contesting in 116 constituencies.

To: Jan Suraaj is contesting in all 243 constituencies.

Also: Add File:Prashant Kishor.jpg as the image in the infobox and under the leader name for Jan Suraaj. AetheriaScribe (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. NotJamestack (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 November 2025

[edit]

According to the Sources AIMIM IS CONTESTING ON 34 SEATS JAN SURAAJ ON 240 SEATS

THIS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED Octoberoman (talk) 11:42, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Day Creature (talk) 22:11, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]