Draft talk:Nika Sandler

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Photography This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Contemporary Art (inactive) This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Contemporary Art, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Artificial Intelligence This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Arts Arts portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

About authorship and neutrality

Hello, and thank you for reviewing this draft! I am Nika Sandler, the artist described in this article. I fully understand Wikipedia’s policies on conflict of interest and have tried to write the draft in a neutral, encyclopedic tone, relying only on independent and verifiable sources (including publications in i-D, Dazed, Liberation, and others). My intention is to ensure that the information is accurate and properly referenced. I would be very grateful for any feedback or suggestions from experienced editors to improve this draft and make it ready for the mainspace. Thank you so much for your time and consideration! Nikasandler (talk) 01:46, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article was written by a human, not an AI

Hello, and thank you for your time reviewing my draft.

I understand your concern regarding LLM-generated text. However, the draft was written and edited manually by me. I’m the subject of the article, but I did my best to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and used only verifiable, independent sources.

I would be very grateful if you could point out specific parts that appear problematic, so I can rewrite them in a more neutral, encyclopedic way.

Thank you again for your work and help. Nikasandler (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so you're trying to convince me that despite the draft using a distinctly LLM-like writing style, and despite this article about yourself listing an "artistic" project that's "a collaboration with AI", you didn't use any generative AI here? I'm having trouble squaring the draft's style and content with the comments you submitted on this page. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for another reviewer

Hello,

I would kindly like to request another reviewer for my draft. I fully respect the reviewing process and appreciate the volunteer editors’ work. However, I feel that the current review may not be entirely impartial, as it has become focused on assumptions about writing style and my artistic practice, rather than the article’s sources and structure.

I’m open to constructive feedback and happy to make all necessary improvements.

Thank you very much for your understanding and time! Nikasandler (talk) 22:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a new review of Draft:Nika Sandler

Hello! I’ve just resubmitted my draft for review

. I’d be very grateful if another reviewer could kindly take a look when time allows. Many thanks for your attention and patience! Nikasandler (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]