Draft talk:Amit Kumar Das

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Bihar India portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. This draft is supported by WikiProject Bihar. Business Business portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Education Education portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Software: Computing This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This draft is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Analysing source reliability, independence, and significance

Sources include:

Times of India - reputable Indian newspaper corporation with full article of 10 paragraphs on Das, another 14-paragraph article on him as well

Bihar Foundation - Bihar state government-sponsored organisation with 1-2 paragraphs on Das

The Telegraph (India) - trusted and reliable newspaper with 9-10 paragraph article on Das

Macquarie University - well-known Australian university with 1-2 paragraphs on Das and another with 1-2 more on Das

Sorry to bother you, but does this satisfy the Sig-Ind-Rel thing? Thanks, @WeWake! Allakas (talk) 04:13, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allakas, hello! I have made some edits to the article to make it more neutral and remove information that does not serve a lot of purpose at the moment. Note there there's a reference (about his award) that appears to be dead and should be fixed. Regarding your source analysis: (a) Times of India unfortunately is not considered a generally reliable source (see WP:TIMESOFINDIA) and the case by case judgement is unlikely to fall in favour for non-news reporting, (b) The Telegraph article was co-written by Amit Kumar Das, hence it is not independent (see WP:Independent), and (c) The MQ university source is only a passing mention. Hope this helps! — WeWake (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the help! Allakas (talk) 04:41, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]