Draft:Mili Panda
| Submission declined on 19 May 2025 by GoldRomean (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 28 March 2025 by Randompersonediting (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Randompersonediting 55 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 26 March 2025 by Flat Out (talk). Possibly notable per WP:POLITICIAN but surely there is more context here? What does "record one time" mean and what's the back story to that? Was her work as a lawyer recognised or written about? Declined by Flat Out 57 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 March 2025 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CNMall41 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 March 2025 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CNMall41 2 months ago. | |
Comment: The reference you added is unreliable under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. This still does not show notability. I would recommend slowing down, reading WP:RS, and then adding a reference that is reliable and talks about the person more in-depth. CNMall41 (talk) 04:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Removing the comment about her being known for her marriage is not an improvement. You need reliable sources that show how she is notable. CNMall41 (talk) 02:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Could possibly meet WP:POLITICIAN based on the claim, but all sources are unreliable under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Also needs cleaned up for tone. If she is notable for being "for being the wife of Sabyasachi Panda," note that notability is not inherent. CNMall41 (talk) 00:09, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Mili Panda | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Constituency | Ranpur |
| Personal details | |
| Born | Subhashree Panda |
| Occupation | |
| Known for | |
Subhashree Panda,[1] also known as Mili Panda, is the wife of Sabyasachi Panda, a Maoist leader.[2] She was elected to the Odisha Legislative Assembly from the Ranpur Assembly constituency.[3] She represents Indian National Congress.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ "Subhashree Panda (Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP)):Constituency- RANPUR(NAYAGARH) - Affidavit Information of Candidate". www.myneta.info. Retrieved 2025-03-22.
- ^ "Maoist leader Sabyasachi Panda's wife Mili Panda makes political debut in Odisha". The Economic Times. 21 Mar 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2025.
- ^ "Mili Panda gets Cong ticket for Odisha Assembly from Ranpur". KalingaTV Bureau. 23 Mar 2019. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
- ^ "Maoist leader Sabyasachi Panda's wife gets Congress ticket for Odisha Assembly polls". Sambad English Bureau. 23 Mar 2019. Retrieved 22 March 2025.
This page will be placed in the following categories if it is moved to the article namespace.
Categories:   | This article about a politician from Odisha is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |