Submission declined on 22 December 2025 by Somepinkdude (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 16 December 2025 by EatingCarBatteries (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by EatingCarBatteries 10 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 15 December 2025 by Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Hurricane Wind and Fire 10 days ago. | |
Comment: Mostly the same reasons as before -- you need significant coverage from multiple secondary, reliable, independent sources. It could also just be me, but the Divessi article not only screams as an advertisement but reads like it's AI-generated. EatingCarBatteries (contributions, talk) 06:29, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: All of the sources are primary, so can only be considered reliable to verify basic facts and do not establish notability. Also, wording like
This functionality is provided free under 'basic membership', with career development resources (which include career opportunity listings, courses, a mentorship program, knowledge sharing masterclasses, publication hosting and a small research grants program) available for those wishing to access 'premium membership' levels
is promotional. We need facts from reliable, secondary sources to establish notability, not what the group advertises or says about themselves. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:21, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
 |
The Coral Reef Research Hub is a professional networking and career development initiative for individuals working in coral reef science, conservation, and management. It was established in the early 2020s by marine scientist Dr Stuart P. Wynne.[1]
Background
[edit]The initiative was developed in response to widely documented challenges in marine and environmental sciences, including limited access to professional networks, career insecurity among early-career researchers, and the globally dispersed nature of coral reef research communities.[2][3] Network-based and digitally mediated professional communities have been increasingly recognised as mechanisms for collaboration, mentoring, and knowledge exchange in environmental research fields that require international and interdisciplinary coordination.[4][5][6]
Activities
[edit]According to organisational materials, the Coral Reef Research Hub aims to facilitate connections among coral reef scientists and professionals across different career stages and sectors, including academia, management, and policy.[7]
Community
[edit]As of December 2025, the Coral Reef Research Hub reported a membership of more than 2,000 individuals and a professional social media following exceeding 65,000 on Linkedin.[8]
References
[edit]- ^ "CoRR Hub".
- ^ Cvitanovic, C., et al. (2018). Building trust among marine conservation practitioners. Conservation Biology, 32(4)
- ^ Van Noorden, Richard (2014-08-14). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature News. 512 (7513): 126–129. doi:10.1038/512126a.
- ^ Granovetter, Mark S. (May 1973). "The Strength of Weak Ties". American Journal of Sociology. 78 (6): 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469. ISSN 0002-9602.
- ^ Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380
- ^ Granovetter, Mark S. (2003-08-14), "The Strength of Weak Ties", Networks in the Knowledge Economy, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-515950-9, retrieved 2025-12-21
- ^ "CoRR Hub".
- ^ "The Coral Reef Research Hub".
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.