Draft:Bacus
Submission declined on 5 August 2025 by Cabrils (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 25 June 2025 by WikiMentor01 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by WikiMentor01 3 months ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 9 June 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Theroadislong 3 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 17 May 2025 by ToadetteEdit (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by ToadetteEdit 4 months ago. | ![]() |
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:NCORP) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. In short, "notability" requires reliable sources about the subject, rather than by the subject.Please note that many of the references would appear to be from sources that are NOT considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, press releases, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify etc). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like an advertorial, which Wikipedia is not (also see WP:PEACOCK). The draft does not appear to show that the subject has any notability beyond the average coverage in trade publications for similar organisations (see WP:ROTM). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being the subject (see WP:AUTOBIO) or being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NCORP criteria #3, because XXXXX"). Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page, including the name of the draft page, and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 00:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Founded | 1980 |
---|---|
Type | Professional organization |
Focus | Photomask Technology |
BACUS (originally Bay Area Chromium Users Society) is a Technical Group of SPIE, the International Society of Optics and Photonics. It supports the development of photomask technologies used in semiconductor manufacturing, primarily through its management of the Photomask Technology and EUV Lithography ("PUV") Symposium.[1]
History
[edit]BACUS was established in 1980 by a group of photomask professionals in Silicon Valley. The founding meeting took place at the Bacchus Inn in Santa Clara, California, where founding attendees, including Jim Wiley, discussed common issues in photomask technology and decided to organize a symposium to address them.[2][3] The following year, BACUS held its first symposium on photomasks and mask making in Sunnyvale, CA. Ten users, local to the San Francisco bay area, including AMI (now Onsemi), Ultratech, Master Images, Signetics, National Semiconductor, IBM, Micromask, Microfab, Hewlett Packard and Fairchild, presented chrome blank user requirements to the vendor community.[4]
In 1991, BACUS became a Technical Group of SPIE, facilitating broader collaboration within the photomask community.[5]
In 2005, the 25th annual BACUS Photomask Technology symposium was held in Monterey, California. with 1,154 attendees and almost 200 papers presented. While attendance still include companies from the Bay Area (Cadence, Synopsys, Mentor Graphics and KLA), international representatives Brion Technologies and ASML were also present. [6][7]
In 2009, Chris Mack, a regular attendee, reported the decline in attendance, due to the economy in his blog.[8]
In 2017, BACUS was co-located with the EUV Lithography Conference, together referred to as the SPIE PUV Symposium.[9]
Industry Impact
[edit]Various industry trade publications like EE Times, Electronic Design News and Semiconductor Engineering, have covered numerous BACUS events and their impact to the mask industry in and beyond the Bay Area.
In 2002, several international vendors (ASML, Leica, Motorola, Photronics, Schott, Unaxis, Veeco and others) claim to have demonstrated a 9-inch reticle production capability over existing 6-inch masks.[10]
In 2003, mask yield under 30% was the topic of concern, where defects represented 50% of all yield loss according to Walter Trybula, a senior fellow at Sematech, a chip-making consortium, based in Austin, TX, and Kurt Kimmel, mask strategy program manager at IBM agrees.[11][12]
At a 2004 SPIE conference, a BACUS panel of mask-makers and users alike discussed whether 193 nm immersion was ready to replace 157 nm dry lithography. The panel included local and international representatives from Mentor Graphics, Advanced Mask Technology Center, AMD, TSMC, Toshiba and Photronics.[13]
In 2005, traditional Electronic Design Automation (EDA) vendors voiced their concerns in Design for Manufacturing (DFM). An increase in attendance by fabless companies was also noted.[6][7]
In 2010, members of the eBeam Initiative, a group of 34 companies including Synopsys Inc., Abeam Technologies Inc., EQUIcon Software GmbH Jena and Tool Corp, discussed a design-to-manufacturing approach known as design for e-beam (DFEB) to reduce mask costs.[14]
In 2024, the PUV conference highlighted the significant progress being made in EUV lithography and photomask technology as indicated by one of the plenary speakers, Christophe Fouquest (CEO of ASML).[15]
Awards
[edit]BACUS issues several awards annually.[16] Awards and a selection of recipients are listed below.
- Lifetime Achievement Award - To recognize an individual who, during their lifetime, have made distinct contributions of business or technical significance to the photomask industry.
Year | Name | Citation | Ref |
---|---|---|---|
2012 | Richard Ole Larson of Toppan Photomask | In recognition for his Contributions to the Photomask Industry 1973 – 2008 and to Honor his actions exemplifying: Leadership by Example, Mentoring, and Operations Excellence. | [17] |
2013 | Deno Macricostas, founder of Photronics | For for his dedication to customer service, strategic acquisitions and partnerships. | [18] |
2014 | Jim Wiley, of ASML | In recognition of contributions to the industry, particularly in the area of photomask defect characterization, printability, and publication. | [19] |
2017 | Dr. Hiroaki Morimoto of Mitsubishi Electronics | Highlights of his work include the ion beam repair system that was commercialized by Seiko Instruments and the invention of the attenuated phase-shifting mask with a single-layer absorptive shifter which is still used in production. | BACUS News, October 2017, Vol. 33, Issue 10[3] |
2018 | Frank Abboud | For his thirty+ years of significant contributions in all areas of photomask technology, more specifically for his leadership in the development of advanced e-beam pattern generation. | BACUS News, October 2018, Vol. 34, Issue 11[3] |
2019 | Uwe Behringer of UBC Microelectronics | In recognition of his promotion and support of the photomask industry over many decades through his efforts to plan and organize The European Mask and Lithography Conference and his unflagging contribution to the Photomask Technology and Photomask Japan conference. | BACUS News, January 2021, Vol. 37, Issue 1[3] |
2021 | Ken Rygler of Rygler and Associates | For influencing the entry of the E.I. Dupont Company into the merchant mask business in the 1980's. | [20][21] |
2024 | Hans Loeschner of IMS Nanofabrication | In recognition of his contributions toward the development of the IMS electron multi-beam mask-writer (MBMW) technology. | [22] |
- BACUS Award - To recognize contributions to the photomask industry that have at least one of the following attributes: a fundamental change or innovation, an enduring contribution, and/or an enabling contribution.
- 2013: Tadahiro Takigawa of ASML Japan in recognition of his contributions toward development and commercialization of high keV vector scanned beam photomask lithography tools. Close to half of all masks are now made with 50 keV VSB technology developed or influenced by Takigawa, first at Toshiba Machine Corp. and subsequently at NuFlare.[18]
- 2014: Dan Meisburger of Tec-Start Consulting in recognition of his work and influence in the development of the high-speed electron beam mask inspection system.[19]
- 2017: Dr. Hans Loeschner and Dr. Elmar Platzgummer of IMS Nanofabrication in recognition of their contribution to the photomask industry through their work and influence to develop and commercialize e-beam lithography tool.[3]
- 2023: Haruhiko Kusunose of Lasertec Corporation in recognition of "The enablement of EUV mask inspection using 193nm optical inspection system"[23]
- Photomask Technology Conference Best Presentation- To recognize an oral presentation and research, this recognition is awarded at the chairs' discretion, typically by committee vote. Presentations are judged on three criteria: technical impact, scientific analysis, and delivery/presentation.
- 2018: Dr. Scott Lewis for his presentation "Design and implementation of the next-generation electron-beam resists for the production of EUVL photomasks"[24]
- 2023: Toshiyuki Todoroki and Kou Gondaira of Lasertec Corporation for their paper, "Actinic pattern mask inspection for high-NA EUV lithography"[23]
- Photomask Technology Conference Best Poster - To recognize a poster presentation and research, recognition is awarded at the chairs' discretion, typically by committee vote.
- 2018: Hayden Alty for his poster "Using 3D Monte Carlo simulation to develop resists for next-generation lithography"[24]
Publications
[edit]Conference Proceedings[25] are published by SPIE and cover a wide range of topics in photomask technology. SPIE also archives BACUS newsletters published from 2010-2023.[3]
- Connecting climate with photomasks: Using skills for good by Emily Gallagher of Imec[26]
- Translating e-beam-litho performance to optical specification by Vistec Electron Beam[27]
References
[edit]- ^ "SPIE BACUS Technical Group". spie.org. Retrieved 2025-04-10.
- ^ Wiley, Jim (October 29, 2018). "Early Silicon Valley Mask Making & BACUS Founding". Medium. Retrieved April 25, 2025.
- ^ a b c d e f "BACUS News". spie.org. Retrieved 2025-04-10.
- ^ "Front Matter: Volume PM81". Bay Area Chrome Users Society Symposium 1981. SPIE. 2023-10-05. p. 0. doi:10.1117/12.3009927. ISBN 978-1-5106-6866-9.
- ^ Levinson, Harry (2023). "Long Live BACUS!". Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning, Materials, and Metrology. 22 (4): 040101. Bibcode:2023JMNMM..22d0101L. doi:10.1117/1.JMM.22.4.040101 – via SPIE Digital Library.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link) - ^ a b McGrath, Dylan (2005-10-07). "Design, manufacturing worlds collide at Bacus". EDN. Retrieved 2025-06-05.
- ^ a b McGrath, Dylan (2005-10-07). "Design, manufacturing worlds collide at Bacus". EE Times. Retrieved 2025-06-19.
- ^ "Making Masks in Monterey". www.lithoguru.com. Retrieved 2025-08-11.
- ^ Willis, Jan (2017-08-17). "What's Changing At BACUS". Semiconductor Engineering. Retrieved 2025-04-10.
- ^ LaPedus, Mark (2002-10-01). "Is the IC industry ready for a new photomask size?". EE Times. Retrieved 2025-02-07.
- ^ LaPedus, Mark (2003-09-12). "Photomask yields become a growing crisis, say experts". EE Times. Retrieved 2025-07-07.
- ^ Lapedus, Mark (2003-09-12). "Photomask yields a growing crisis, experts warn". EDN. Retrieved 2025-07-07.
- ^ EETimes (2004-02-25). "Bacus panel wrings out immersion lithography". EE Times. Retrieved 2025-07-07.
- ^ McGrath, Dylan (2010-09-23). "The horror of 80-hour photomask write times". EE Times. Retrieved 2025-07-07.
- ^ Levinson, Harry (2024-12-04). "Takeaways From The 2024 SPIE Photomask Technology + EUV Conference". Semiconductor Engineering. Retrieved 2025-04-24.
- ^ "Photomask Technology + EUV Lithography awards". spie.org. Retrieved 2025-04-14.
- ^ "In memoriam: Rich Larson". spie.org. Retrieved 2025-05-09.
- ^ a b SPIE. "Industry Leaders Drive SPIE Photomask Technology Conference". www.prweb.com. Retrieved 2025-05-09.
- ^ a b Cicero, Diogenes (2014-10-06). "Photomask Technology speaker says EUV is nearly production-ready | Semiconductor Digest". Retrieved 2025-07-07.
- ^ "Oral History Interview: Ken Rygler | SEMI". www.semi.org. Retrieved 2025-08-11.
- ^ "Ken Rygler receives 2021 Bacus Lifetime Achievement award". spie.org. Retrieved 2025-06-09.
- ^ ims-admin-2024 (2024-10-22). "BACUS 2024 Lifetime Achievement Award for IMS Co-Founder Hans Loeschner". IMS Nanofabrication GmbH. Retrieved 2025-06-09.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ a b "Lasertec Receives "BACUS Prize" and "Best Paper Presentation Award" at SPIE Photomask Technology + EUVL Exhibition 2023". Lasertec Corporation. Retrieved 2025-06-05.
- ^ a b "KNI Collaborators Win Two Awards at 2018 SPIE Photomask Technology + EUV Lithography Conference". The Kavli Nanoscience Institute. 2018-10-12. Retrieved 2025-06-19.
- ^ "SPIE Digital Library Photomask Technology Proceedings". www.spiedigitallibrary.org. Retrieved 2025-06-05.
- ^ "Connecting climate with photomasks: Using skills for good | Electro Optics". www.electrooptics.com. Retrieved 2025-06-19.
- ^ "Meet us at Bacus Photomask Technology 2024 in Monterey, CA". www.vistec-semi.com. 2024-09-24. Retrieved 2025-06-05.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.