Van der Meer formula

The Van der Meer formula is a formula for calculating the required stone weight for armourstone under the influence of (wind) waves. This is necessary for the design of breakwaters and shoreline protection. Around 1985 it was found that the Hudson formula in use at that time had considerable limitations (only valid for permeable breakwaters and steep (storm) waves). That is why the Dutch government agency Rijkswaterstaat commissioned Deltares to start research for a more complete formula. This research, conducted by Jentsje van der Meer, resulted in the Van der Meer formula in 1988, as described in his dissertation.[1] This formula reads [2] [3]

and

In this formula:

Hs = Significant wave height at the toe of the construction
Δ = relative density of the stone (= (ρs -ρw)/ρw) where ρs is the density of the stone and ρw is the density of the water
dn50 = nominal stone diameter
α = breakwater slope
P = notional permeability
S = Damage number
N = number of waves in the storm
ξm = the Iribarren number calculated with the Tm

This formula yields that the damage S is proportionnal to Hs5.

For design purposes, for the coefficient cp the value of 5,2 and for cs the value 0,87 is recommended.[2]

Notional permeability according to Van der Meer (1988)

The value of P can be read from attached graph. Until now, there is no good method for determining P different than with accompanying pictures. Research is under way to try to determine the value of P using calculation models that can simulate the water movement in the breakwater (OpenFOAM models).

The value of the damage number S is defined as

[4]

where A is the area of the erosion area. Permissible values for S are:[2]

Definition of the damage area in the Van der Meer formula
slope Start of damage Average damage, repair needed Failure (core is exposed))
1:1,5 2 3-5 8
1:2 2 4-6 8
1:3 2 6-9 12
1:4 3 8-12 17
1:6 3 8-12 17


Further developments

[edit]

After its publication the VdM formula was re-assessed by several researchers. E.g., Vidal (2006)[5] suggested to replace Hs by H50 defined as the average wave height of the 50 highest waves reaching a rubble-mound breakwater in its useful life. His formulation can therefore predict the observed damage independently of the sea state wave height distribution or the succession of sea states, i.e., the number of waves N can be deleted from the formula. However, the calculus of H50 requires detailed information of the incident wave statistics at the structure's toe, both for short term (sea states) and long term (wave regimes).

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Van der Meer, J.W. (1988). Rock slopes and gravel beaches under wave attack. TU Delft and Deltares. pp. 214 p.
  2. ^ a b c CIRIA, CUR, CETMEF (2007). "5". The rock manual : the use of rock in hydraulic engineering. London: CIRIA C683. pp. 567–577. ISBN 9780860176831.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Coastal Engineering Manual EM 1110-2-1100, part VI,chapter 5. US Army Corps of Engineers. 2011. p. 74.
  4. ^ Broderick, L.L. (1983). "Riprap stability, a progress report". Proc. Coastal Structures ’83. American Society of Civil Engineering. pp. 320–330.
  5. ^ Vidal, C., Medina, R., & Lomonaco, P. (2006). Wave height parameter for damage description of rubble mound breakwater. Coastal Engineering, 53, 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2006.02.007