User talk:~2025-31317-79
November 2025
[edit]
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Lakewood Church, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. JavaHurricane 05:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- What personal attacks?
- At no point in the Lakewood Church talk page did a make a "personal attack" against anyone?
- What is considered to be a personal attack?
- "
- -Abusive, defamatory, or derogatory phrases based on race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, religious or political beliefs, disability, ethnicity, nationality, etc. directed against another editor or a group of editors. Disagreement over what constitutes a religion, race, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or ethnicity is not a legitimate excuse.
- _
- -Using someone's affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views—regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream. An example could be, "You're a railfan so what would you know about fashion?" Note that it is not a personal attack to question an editor about their possible conflict of interest on a specific article or topic. However, be aware that speculation regarding the real-life identity of another editor may constitute outing.
- _
- -Using someone's political affiliations as an ad hominem means of dismissing or discrediting their views, such as accusing them of being left-wing or right-wing, is also forbidden. Editors are allowed to have personal political POV, as long as it does not negatively affect their editing and discussions.
- _
- -Linking to external attacks, harassment, or other material, for the purpose of attacking another editor.
- _
- -Comparing editors to Nazis, terrorists, dictators, or other infamous people. (See also Godwin's law.)
- _
- -Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence, usually in the form of diffs and links.
- _
- -Threats, including, but not limited to:
- Threats of legal action
- Threats of violence or other off-wiki action (particularly death threats)
- _
- -Threats or actions which deliberately expose other Wikipedia editors to political, religious or other persecution by a government, their employer, or any others. Violations of this sort may result in a block for an extended period of time, which may be applied immediately by any administrator upon discovery. Admins applying such sanctions should confidentially notify the members of the Arbitration Committee of what they have done and why.
- Threats to out (give out personal details about) an editor." ~2025-31317-79 (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 07:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)- That makes absolutely no sense. I've posted many detailed rationale's as to why the information on Lakewood's talk page was slander. I was met with fierce opposition from two admins and another user, all of whom violated Wikipedia's policies, refused to engage in discussion with me by deleting my replies on their talk page, or simply ignoring my replies.
- They then appealed to higher level admins to strong arm their desired revision on Lakewood's then locked article, and lied claiming that I refused to engage in discussion with them.
- This resulted in me receiving a temporary 2 day ban and instructions to continue the discussion on Lakewood's talk page.
- Which I then did, following procedure. My post was immediately taken down by another admin for claims of Vandalism, which my post in no way met the criteria for. I reposted my post, and JavaHurricane then falsely claimed there were personal attacks in my response. Which we can see above, I have listed all of the definitions of personal attacks and nowhere in my response were any personal attacks.
- And then you decided to ban my account claiming that I was not interested in building an encyclopedia, when literally my entire effort and focus was improving upon the misinformation being disseminated through this encyclopedia.
- All of this is documented and verifiable.
- And I'm happy to discuss this further. ~2025-31317-79 (talk) 20:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)