User talk:ZeroKnowledgeNode

This is ZeroKnowledgeNode's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ülkü Hilal Çiftçi (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ülkü Hilal Çiftçi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZeroKnowledgeNode! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:40, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ülkü Hilal Çiftçi (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ülkü Hilal Çiftçi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 15:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ülkü Hilal Çiftçi (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ülkü Hilal Çiftçi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:30, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI

Hi, quick question - are you using AI tools for your edits here? If so, can you mention:

• What tool(s) you are using, and what versions
• The process you are using -- what specific prompts, features, etc
• What review you are doing of the output

Thank you. Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:05, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's nice to hear from you.

Honestly, I was so surprised that you wanted to tell me something about those LLMs.

I know what kind of mess they can bring.

Maybe you’re not getting it, so let me explain: AI models are fed with huge amounts of Internet-collected data; nevertheless, when these models start producing content based not on factual information, but on patterns learned from other, potentially inaccurate or misleading sources, we call this "hallucination" in the field of AI development.

Anyway, mostly I use them to summarise long articles and sometimes for some visual editing.

I do always double check the results to see if any mistakes were made.

If you ever come across an article that seems incorrect, I’d be happy to help verify or clarify it. Please don't misunderstand me, I'm just a bit harsh by nature.

Sincerely yours. ZeroKnowledgeNode (talk) 16:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]