User talk:Yesyesmrcool

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Jacob Hersant, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! TarnishedPath^talk 09:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that and wasn't aware. How would I be able to show a picture of his face then? Yesyesmrcool (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest having a read of Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline to see if you're able to upload that particular file or similar directly to Wikipedia. You can't however upload non-free images to commons like you did. Images uploaded to Commons must be either in the public domain or released under a free license. TarnishedPath^talk 08:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to World War III, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kioumars Pourhashemi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kioumars Pourhashemi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kioumars Pourhashemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ladsgroup^overleg 17:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 14:16, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

American politics contentious topics alert

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 19:09, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Zohran Mamdani. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:25, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly did I do that? I was trying to be fair and I was being ganged up by like 5 people defending him when he clearly made racial remarks. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's the problem.. He didn't make racist remarks. You must know that the wealthier neighborhoods in NYC are predominantly white, surely? Doug Weller talk 16:54, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know that they are whiter but it's also rude to bring race into it when he could have just said wealthier neighborhoods or named specific neighborhood. Furthermore, I don't think I broke good faith as I was seriously trying to help and I don't see how a warning is needed instead of just shutting the topic and not adding it. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just make sure you don’t call him racist. And our opinions on what he should have said are irrelevant and don’t belong. Doug Weller talk 17:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe I called him racist nor is that my intent all im saying is he made it a racial thing but I wouldn't say there is any proof that he is racist. Well it's clear your opinions were on there as the guy I was debating with multiple times talked about white supremacy and the lies of GOP and Fox news. I'm sorry if I did anything wrong but I was just trying to let everyone get all sides of the story and having the warning removed would be nice. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 17:34, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see anyone object to adding text about Mamdani's statement in the article, including the phrase "richer and whiter neighborhoods," as long as (a) it's sourced to one or more RSs, and (b) the WP text accurately captures what he was saying about property taxes. As for the warning, you're free to remove this entire section if you want (see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines § User talk pages), though it will remain in the page's edit history. FactOrOpinion (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The other guy was clearly objecting and calling it lies. What is the point of removing the warning if it stays and I believe it's unfair. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 20:43, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see him objecting to text that satisfies the two conditions I mentioned above. Regardless, I'm not going to debate it on your talk page.

In general, any content that has been added to any page on the WP website will be accessible through the page's edit history. (There are rare exceptions, but this isn't one of them.) You may feel that it's unfair, but that's just how the WP website works. FactOrOpinion (talk) 21:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm debating the fact that the warning is unfair and there has to be a way to appeal it. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 21:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the contentious topics alerts apply to talk pages

Your behavior at Talk:Zohran Mamdani included. I suggest you take a step back. Doug Weller talk 08:28, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Dujana al-Jubouri moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abu Dujana al-Jubouri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JBchrch talk 20:28, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well I made the article because he is at this time a high ranking ISIS commander but there isn't many sources about him currently so it looks like it might have to sit for awhile Yesyesmrcool (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ader (surname)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ader (surname), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:11, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]