User talk:Yagiv
Welcome!
[edit]{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking |
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
|
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
New article
[edit]Yagiv (talk) 07:35, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gene Baylos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Jessel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Reported
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding genocidal speech and personal attacks. The thread is User:Yagiv. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 23:03, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Yagiv, on Wikipedia we have a policy WP:OR. It doesn’t matter if you personally think Rima Hassan is antisemitic. What matters on Wikipedia is whether WP:RS describe Hassan as antisemitic. Your personal beliefs are irrelevant. We follow what reliable sources say for WP:V. starship.paint (talk / cont) 00:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
MilesVorkosigan (talk) 23:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger One ping only 05:49, 10 July 2025 (UTC)