User talk:XyloTechieBoy

Welcome!

Hi XyloTechieBoy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Apparition¹¹ ^Talk/Contribs 12:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks XyloTechieBoy (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Apparition11. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Daikin seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Talk/Contribs 10:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In which edit? XyloTechieBoy (talk) 15:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry for the edit I made in Daikin. I will never do that again. Will my account blocked for this? XyloTechieBoy (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I add that again by using my own words? XyloTechieBoy (talk) 15:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Everything you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Primefac (talk) 18:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hello, thanks for your edits. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but unfortunately many of your edits have been reverted for lots of reasons. For example:

Your edit to Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident actually introduced a grammatical mistake because in the phrase "In a December 13, 2005, interview ...", the date is an adjectival phrase so it needs "a" before it.
Many of your edits are unsourced or violate copyright, such as at Realme 5, Switched-mode power supply, etc. With your edit to DVD player, you added text that's not appropriate for the opening part of the article (or lead section), which is supposed to be a summary.
Re your edit to Cassette tape, you added text that wasn't confirmed by the cited source ... every piece of text should be confirmed by its reference, per our policy on reference integrity.

If you want more information about why I reverted your edits, see the edit summaries in my contributions at the time (most of the edits I dealt with there are yours). If you want to know why your edits were undone by other people, check te page history for each of the articles you've edited.

You might find the page Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors useful. In case you're not aware, there are Wikipedias in non-English languages (e.g. Hindi) that you might want to check out; their articles are sometimes smaller than ours and you might find it easier to contribute to them.

If you need more help with Wikipedia, feel free to ask questions at the teahouse, a friendly space for new editors. Graham87 (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:XyloTechieBoy/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 06:16, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XyloTechieBoy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 06:16, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]