User talk:Wimayo
Re: Kiko Pangilinan
[edit]Below is my response to your edit summary, "Per WP:UNDUE and WP:SUMMARYSTYLE, dedicating over one-third of the article to election history gives disproportionate weight to a single aspect of the subject's career, resulting in an imbalance that is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policy on due weight and summary style in biographical articles.":
The "Electoral history" section of Kiko Pangilinan's Wikipedia page does not violate the due and undue weight policy, as it presents uncontroversial, widely reported facts central to his political career and not a minority or fringe viewpoint, which the policy cautions against giving disproportionate attention (per policy, "articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views"). A politician's election record is a core, reliably sourced aspect of their public life and is appropriately detailed in proportion to its prominence in coverage. While concerns may arise if this section visually dominates the page, you are partially correct in the sense that it is more a matter of summary style and article balance than neutrality. As the Manual of Style suggests, such content can be summarized with a concise table in the main article and, if needed, split into a separate subpage ("summary style is used to split long or detailed information into summary sections with links to full subarticles") to ensure readability without undermining due weight. Let me know if you think we should split that section into a separate subpage (i.e. "Electoral history of Kiko Pangilinan").
Thank you. signed, Pat talk 06:35, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.