If you hadn't noticed, many of your reviews were added back to the articles. However, most of those articles refer to brands of bourbon, not specific bourbons within that brand. For example, Eagle Rare has two distinct bourbons produced today - the 10 year and the 17 year. Please go through your reviews and specifically mention WHICH bourbon the review was about. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thank you for the tip and very good point.--WellsWiggins (talk) 17:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your willingness to contribute and be responsive to some of the feedback you've gotten. That doesn't always happen and it's appreciated. Ravensfire (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback is VERY appreciated. Sorry to make some boneheaded mistakes. WellsWiggins (talk) 14:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to this there was a request on the talk page. However, I could not see any comments at Talk:Morgan Murphy (food critic) after 2015. If you think the the page should be moved then open a discussion following the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial. However, most of the article seems to be about his activities other than his naval career. If the naval portion is so important then why does he not appear in categories reflecting that> Such as Category:21st-century American naval officers? By the way it would be Morgan Murphy (naval officer) or Morgan Murphy (United States Navy officer). CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]