User talk:Warriorglance

Your thread has been archived

Hello Warriorglance! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Should AD/BC be added?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter!

Happy Easter to you @Warriorglance.

Some Appam for you!

_{Sorry if this breaks your talk page!} CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 14:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter to you as well! Sorry for not seeing it earlier. don't care about my talk page Warriorglance(talk to me) 02:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 13:18, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Full House

I’m not really sure why you said that this edit is unconstructive and required a revert and a warning. It seems like an innocuous edit that added context as the character is recently widowed at the beginning of the show and is the impetus for the other characters moving in to the house (thus making it a Full House). While it is also a good idea to add an edit summary, the editor is new and reverting just based on not using one on a non-controversial edit seems like WP:BITEing to me. I think it’s a good addition and I ask that you reconsider and please revert the removal and the warning on the editors talk page. Thank you. cyberdog958^Talk 19:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out! Now when I look at it, The edit just seems okay, I don't know what I was thinking about the previous day. Oh yeah, this edit came in the "likely have problems" filter. Dont worry, I'll just revert my edits and try not to bite someone.(I was not meaning to do it btw). Thanks, Warriorglance(talk to me) 02:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it’s no problem, I figured it was an accident and you didn’t mean any malice. I’ve noticed a lot of good edits get caught in that filter too and I’ve made similar mistakes before by judging too fast, and I just wanted to let you know. Happy Easter to you. cyberdog958^Talk 03:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Happy belated Easter to you as well . today's monday for me :) Warriorglance(talk to me) 03:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of ambassadors of Israel to Greece

Hello, Warriorglance,

Please do not replace a PROD tag if it has been removed from an article or file. A PROD tag can be removed for any reason or for no reason at all by any editor, registered or IP account. If you believe this article still warrants deletion, you can always pursue nominating it for deletion at AFD. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right, got it👍. I was just patrolling recent changes when I saw this removal and I thought the article required deletion. Hence, an unnecessary removal.

So, PROD tags aren't supposed to be added back? Warriorglance(talk to me) 11:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]