User talk:Vu2srk

Prashanth Techno moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Prashanth Techno. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cinder painter (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prashanth Techno (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CoconutOctopus talk 11:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Vu2srk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 11:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prashanth Techno (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Taabii (talk) 11:49, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Taabii,
Thanks for the feedback. It seems like my references in this article suffice the criteria of reliable, secondary and independent. Can you give me a little more detail on why it is being declined and what can help? Vu2srk (talk) 12:01, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prashanth Techno (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rahmatula786 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]