User talk:Utcursch
Archives: 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47
Administrators' newsletter – July 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).

Interface administrator changes
- Following a talk page discussion, speedy deletion criterion G13 has been amended to remove "Userspace with no content except the article wizard placeholder text."
- WP:Manual of Style/Superscripts and subscripts was upgraded to a guideline following a RfC discussion.
- The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
- Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!
The Signpost: 18 July 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Is no WikiNews good WikiNews? — Election season returns!
- In the media: How bad (or good) is Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Medicine reaches milestone of zero unreferenced articles
- Recent research: Knowledge manipulation on Russia's Wikipedia fork; Marxist critique of Wikidata license; call to analyze power relations of Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Form 990 released for the Wikimedia Foundation’s fiscal year 2023-2024
- Discussion report: Six thousand noticeboard discussions in 2025 electrically winnowed down to a hundred
- Comix: Divorce
- Traffic report: God only knows
Need your attention!
[edit]Hi Utcursch,
Kindly check these two discussions -
[1], [2], User:McKhan2 is particularly engaging these discussions as clear harassment and just accused of you being tagged there for Wikipedia:Canvassing. Meanwhile, that person tagged you first in the discussion along with Ekdalian to get support from previous editors who have edited my edits in edit summaries while not even checking discussion tagged as "Kalal POV pushing", where you advised to not push Kalal POV here but with context use where Ahluwalia caste is mentioned itself given two different identities. Now, they first accuse me of not letting Kalal mention there, meanwhile, that discussion suggests the opposite. Then they propose to edit the entire article but it has been well attributed and edited in the same way as they proposed.
After I keep hinting at their true opinion of BIAS and Harassment involving my edits by using analysis to gaslight and divert conversations and keep tagging you and Ekdalian, another editor who removed well sourced edits by just mentioning their pov in edit summaries.
It is a caste of varied origins, and "distinct social groups" as you said and should be kept like that but they think "only Kalal/Kalwar pov" is valid. I remember a few socpup-users who were banned for doing same tone edits like @Newworldruler [1] banned by admin @Discospinster. All the same, they engage in talk discussion doing similar stuff while acting as some core-policies fan. I am certainly not that much fan of such discussions Utcursch and would really love your attention and time on reading the discussions and please read my replies as well. Whatever I answer, the next reply carefully is cherrypicked with the words to again "gaslight." They are just so negatively directed with continuos misinterpretations starting from deviating my "note saying, I checked their edits again on the page after nearly a month" by saying that's a lie citing work prior to their such engagements and including your and others edit summaries and now accusing of CANVASS when I cited "KALAL POV PUSHING" to be read and not edit summaries to support their lame accusations.
Repeated warnings and continuous non-good faith replies by first accusing of stuff and then acting like they care and want to move forward by suggesting another misleading edits. After your guidance and Abecdare's as well on previous edits, my work is based on Wikipedia policies with keeping relevance in mind. All the topics are mentioned with sources, and if you find even a single line or two without sources, just let me know, I have bookmarked enough to add but given AirshipJungle... editors note to not overcite as they removed many references, I have limited them. Those conversations are diverting from one topic to another and to next to keep engaging in such deliberate misinterpretation attacks that appear to be subtle and personal.
I have nothing to add but just the discussion there and one-time checking the article which is well-quoted and sourced is enough as a reply. Thank you Utcursch, I am going offline and if they edit anything given their continuous harassment on contentious topics, I will check and respond to it later and do hope your attention there. HilssaMansen19Irien1291S • spreading wiki love ~ Message here; no calls 08:59, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- @HilssaMansen19: I am quite busy outside of Wikipedia these days. Please drop a note at WT:IND -- someone may be able to take a look. utcursch | talk 21:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).
- Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
- Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.
- Administrators can now restrict the "Add a Link" feature to newcomers. The "Add a Link" Structured Task helps new account holders get started with editing. Administrators can configure this setting in the Community Configuration page.
- The arbitration case Indian military history has been closed.
- South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as
All pages related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.
- The contentious topic designations for Sri Lanka (SL) and India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (IPA) are folded into this new contentious topic.
- The community-authorized general sanctions regarding South Asian social groups (GS/CASTE) are rescinded and folded into this new contentious topic.
- South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as
- The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 31 July.
- The arbitration case Transgender healthcare and people has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 11 August.
- Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.
The Signpost: 9 August 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Court order snips out part of Wikipedia article, editors debate whether to frame shreds or pulp them
- Discussion report: News from ANI, AN, RSN, BLPN, ELN, FTN, and NPOVN
- Disinformation report: The article in the most languages
- Community view: News from the Villages Pump
- Crossword: Accidental typography
- Traffic report: I'm not the antichrist or the Superman
Nomination of Operation Rajiv for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Rajiv until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of GSFC Complex INA for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GSFC Complex INA, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSFC Complex INA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).
- An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.
- Administrators can now access the Special:BlockedExternalDomains page from the Special:CommunityConfiguration list page. This makes it easier to find. T393240
- The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
- An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
The Signpost: 9 September 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation loses a round in court
- In the media: Congress probes, mayor whitewashed, AI stinks
- Disinformation report: A guide for Congress
- Recent research: Minority-language Wikipedias, and Wikidata for botanists
- Technology report: A new way to read Wikisource
- Traffic report: Check out some new Weapons, weapon of choice
- Essay: The one question
The Signpost: 2 October 2025
[edit]- News and notes: Larry Sanger returns with "Nine Theses on Wikipedia"; WMF publishes transparency report
- In the media: Extraordinary eruption of "EVIL" explained
- Disinformation report: Emails from a paid editing client
- Discussion report: Sourcing, conduct, policy and LLMs: another 1,339 threads analyzed
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia a merchant of (non-)doubt for glyphosate?; eight projects awarded Wikimedia Research Fund grants
- Opinion: Some disputes aren't worth it
- Obituary: Michael Q. Schmidt
- Traffic report: Death, hear me call your name
- Comix: A grand spectacle