User talk:Umakantm

This is Umakantm's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pandit Kulamani Mishra (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pandit Kulamani Mishra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Umakantm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thilsebatti (talk) 04:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Thilsebatti,

thank you for reviewing my draft submission. I have carefully revised the article to address the feedback about neutral tone and reliable sources. I believe I have:

- Removed all promotional language and peacock terms

- Ensured a formal, encyclopedic tone throughout

- Added citations from independent, published sources

- Maintained a neutral point of view

If you find any specific issues that still need attention, please let me know and I will be happy to make the necessary modifications. I'm keen to learn Wikipedia's standards and contribute properly.

Thank you for your guidance. Umakantm (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]