User talk:Ukrain4Pal
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Ukrain4Pal! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! TurboSuperA+[talk] 12:15, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
Use of LLMs to edit articles
[edit]
Hello, I'm TurboSuperA+. An edit that you recently made to 2025 Marche regional election seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TurboSuperA+[talk] 12:16, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't use llm. Here's my detailed editing history regarding the topic. It was all handwritten with only the information taken from the web with the help of gpt4. Ukrain4Pal (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- This revision includes the following text:
Here are some of the candidates from the Matteo Ricci Presidente list (coalition: centre-left / “Alleanza del Cambiamento”) in different provinces (non-Wikipedia sources):
andIf you want, I can send you the complete list of all candidates for “Matteo Ricci Presidente” (all provinces) with full names. Do you want that?
- That is evidence that an LLM was used to search for names and compile the list.
with obly the information taken from the web with the help of gpt4
- That is what I am talking about. Information that is found "with the help of gpt4" can be hallucinated/wrong. Please see WP:LLM, to read about LLM use on Wikipedia. TurboSuperA+[talk] 12:39, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, but that was on my userpage. Not on an encyclopedic wikipedia article. I edited and crosschecked every information that gpt4 gave me from these sources, 1, 2, 3. And after that i added the edited version (edited by me) without blatantly copy pasting the llm. Which, as far as i know, is acceptable per WP:P&G and WP:LLMCIR. Ukrain4Pal (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- This revision includes the following text:
- @Ukrain4Pal Please do not remove the LLM tag from articles until you can confirm that what the LLM output is true. I did not revert your removal, per WP:AGF. Then while finding sources for the names on the list I found two mistakes: "Cavaliere" was spelled as "Cavalieri" and instead of "Gatti" the surname was written as "Dattilo". See diff. I hope that this shows you that LLMs make mistakes all the time and that their output should be closely scrutinised. TurboSuperA+[talk] 11:39, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Marche regional election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SWG. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on 2025 Marche regional election
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 Marche regional election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.