User talk:Tusdoking
July 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm UmbyUmbreon. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Talk:Clint Eastwood, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! UmbyUmbreon (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Talk:List of conspiracy theories, and Talk:Clint Eastwood. Long WP:SOAPBOX rants and bizarre claims about living people such as this [1], and this [2] are not helpful. Please read WP:BLP. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi I'm going to need another person from "list of conspiracy theories" to confirm that "list of conspiracy theories" doesn't want to host a new "conspiracy topic" in it's "list of conspiracy theories." If you're just trying to keep this quiet, there's better ways to do that and my number is (Redacted) and I am in Utah. Tusdoking (talk) 22:33, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Please do not post personal information like phone numbers on Wikipedia. We have a policy of redacting this information whenever it is posted. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 05:13, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 15:18, 30 July 2025 (UTC)- Hi PhilKnight, I understand the challenges of staying on top of all matters regarding Wikipedia especially because every topic is sensitive to at least one person. If you'll notice, LuckyLouie made false scapegoating claims about me implying that I had wantonly posted on random pages when I did not. There is a growing conspiracy suggesting that the parent's of the actor Clint Eastwood were knowingly or unknowingly part of a "Super Soldier Serum" project in the 1920's-1930's and that after Eastwood's birth he was targeted by the most sinister layers of that project in unthinkable ways. This includes that before he was an actor, females being forced, bribed or influenced to target him to be impregnated by him because of his "supernatural" DNA. At the age of 18, this resulted in a female relentlessly stalking him. It is believed that this female became impregnated by him and that she gave birth to a boy without Eastwood knowing. This boy only lived until the age of 29 and then was murdered or committed suicide. That day was December 18, 1978. However, before that boy who was named Matthew J. Harris by his adoptive but controversial parents, fathered two sons and one daughter from two females before he died. At the time of his death he was married to the female who he fathered a daughter and a son with. The daughters' current whereabouts are unknown but the son was found living deep in the mountains of Utah. The son is believed to still be alive and if so is 47 years old. As this son approached his late 30's, his resemblance to Eastwood became impossible to ignore. Through a counterintuitive chain of events, a girlfriend of that son began looking into connections to Eastwood and Harris online. Shortly after that, that son and the girlfriend began having bizarre encounters with a black SUV that would appear at odd times day or night or while they were driving. It seemed the SUV was attempting to "rage bait" them into an altercation. Eventually, they son and the girlfriend retreated into the mountains of Utah. During the process, an "at home" DNA test revealed a peculiar match to what is now believed to have been a member of the "Eastwood" bloodline but a few days later the match was deleted.
- LuckyLouie also claimed my posts were "negative" about Eastwood which they clearly were not and focus on several sources that when weaved together outline the pathway of how Eastwood's parents, Eastwood, his known and unknown children and his known and unknown grandchildren may have been targeted or intentionally mis-led along the way. Because there are also connections to Mormonism, links about that were also included.
- Because media outlets are looking into this and because images of the grandson over the past few years resemble Eastwood in a way that is impossible to ignore, it seemed that it would be appropriate to post a neutral, general summary of this "conspiracy" on Wikipedia if Wikipedia had a page for "Conspiracies." I found two pages related to "conspiracies" and posted the general summary on the "talk" portion of those two pages. I asked for guidance, I included many new references and I indicated that I was 100% open to the draft being censored, redacted etc...in any way. I noticed that Wikipedia also has a page about "The Deep State" and that is why I used that term however that term can also be removed. As I said, I am 100% open to censoring the draft I shared in anyway.
- Instead, LuckyLouie, for one reason or another has scapegoated me for elimination and being blocked on Wikipedia because of that. Nowdays, we also know that when people try to scapegoat others in less-than-honest ways like LuckyLouie did to me, it is because they are trying to hide something or keep something hidden. Unironically, that would also be along the lines of what seems to have happened starting with Eastwood's parents almost 100 years ago and it is a shame that not even Wikipedia is immune to those counterintuitive misbehaviors resulting in me being "blocked" instead of receiving guidance, feedback and the desired draft being linked on the two "conspiracy" pages. Because of that, it is important to me to share that if anyone is trying to keep this hidden today, its likely they have been misinformed and this may be because the most sinister layers behind what many people believe is "The Deep State" is actually "Deep State Utah" and those layers seem to be "at war" with eachother and there is unthinkable evidence of that too and that is why I initially shared the link to "Juggernaut Bubblegum" but then redacted it until it can be published to the Internet Archive and considered for linking to Wikipedia from there. In the meantime, I also submitted the draft to be its own page on Wikipedia with the title: "Clint Eastwood Super Soldier Serum and Bloodline Elimination Conspiracy" (aka "Project Captain America.") I am also 100% open to censoring that title as well.
- Because my phone number is already public as part of other publications including "Juggernaut Bubblegum," which is free on google docs and will continue to be free through Internet Archive after being updated there later today, July 30, 2025, I also shared it if a conversation seems productive but I believe it has since also been deleted. At times I get many calls a day however rarely more than a day or two goes by that I can't at least send a quick message acknowledging a call and making plans to patiently and politely talk for a few minutes. I am also just one of many people who share ways to contact them for free as part of helping all of us shine the better-than-bright-light of the truth by asking these questions and making these suggestions and sharing resources as they come available and it seems to be working as many people are experiencing "scapegoating," "shadow banning" and other short-sighted methods aimed at controlling certain narratives.
- For your own reference, I can attach the draft I submitted to Wikipedia for it's own page. I followed the tips and suggestions about how to insert links and believe I have done everything Wikipedia expects and that Wikipedia users rely on. Thank you. Tusdoking (talk) 18:25, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Clint Eastwood Super Soldier Serum and Bloodline Elimination Conspiracy (July 30)
[edit]
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clint Eastwood Super Soldier Serum and Bloodline Elimination Conspiracy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Tusdoking!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 02:09, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
|
July 2025
[edit]
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:42, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
[edit]A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Polite observations and thank you
[edit]
Tusdoking (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I added a patient and polite explanation for PhilKnight and did so as a polite reply before discovering this method Tusdoking (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That's nice, but has nothing to do with the reason for the block(WP:NOTHERE). In looking at your edits, I think the reason is correct. 331dot (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Politely, about those other pages...
[edit]Tusdoking (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
any elaboration on the parameters broken by the other conspiracy pages and the "deep state" page but ignored rather than those pages being deleted or blocked like mine. It seems that in the draft I offered, there is plenty of opportunity for censoring certain names or links rather than entirely eliminating the possibility of a post or page based on the framework of it and those other pages on Wikipedia Tusdoking (talk) 21:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:29, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.